Why Do We Use Sh*t Instead of Just Typing ****? :smile:

  • Thread starter Thread starter rootX
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the use of profanity in online forums, particularly the challenges posed by censorship filters. Participants express frustration over the limitations of these filters, noting that while certain words are deemed unacceptable, others like "sh*t" are often used without issue. This inconsistency can lead to confusion, especially with similar-sounding words that can alter meaning or tense. Some contributors suggest that understanding the historical context of such words could reduce their perceived vulgarity. The conversation also touches on the awkwardness of navigating censorship when discussing specific topics, such as referencing authors with censored names. Overall, the dialogue highlights the complexities of language, censorship, and communication in digital spaces.
rootX
Messages
478
Reaction score
4
instead of simply typing ****! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oo, I got the answer!
but still, doesn't make much sense
 
because they're are so many other four letter words that **** could be
 
oo, initially I didn't type ****; filter did that.

But I wonder why there's even such filter when people use sh*t anyways and it is considered acceptable.
 
It's not always considered acceptable. It's both profane and vague, so it could cause communication problems in at least a couple of ways.
 
It's so that people know which bad word you aren't using. ;-p
 
It does make it a wee bit bothersome anytime you need to mention a textbook authored by Lifsh!tz!
 
Why we use [deleted for content] ...
Because, for some strange reason, you think that if the software censor is not actually invoked, then you're not breaking the forum's language rules. Or, maybe, because you are intentionally violating those rules, and wish to thwart the software censor's attempts to obscure it.
 
Last edited:
Math Is Hard said:
It's not always considered acceptable. It's both profane and vague, so it could cause communication problems in at least a couple of ways.

Yes, for example, one might confuse sh*t with shat, thus making the tense unclear.
 
  • #10
Be@ts me. I don't run up against this problem.
 
  • #11
why not just shit?
or
Shit

Anyway I am far too young to be using thwese words or even understand them. I'm off to wash my mouth out now
 
  • #12
I use the exclamation mark. I foresee a thread lock in the future, and possibly a banning, but that's just the psychic in me...
 
  • #13
Ivan Seeking said:
Yes, for example, one might confuse sh*t with shat, thus making the tense unclear.

I have done that on several occasions...(So many awkward times I walked into a bathroom in use because of bad censorship.)
 
  • #14
SHIP
HIGH
IN
TRANSIT

Knowing the history of a word makes it a lot less vulgar. It's obscene that such a word is censored.
 
  • #15
Pythagorean said:
SHIP
HIGH
IN
TRANSIT

Knowing the history of a word makes it a lot less vulgar. It's obscene that such a word is censored.


FINALLY i understand
 
  • #16
I think a 'history of curse words' thread would be educational, but it would be kind of confusing talking about **** vs. **** or the advantages of **** over ****.
 
Back
Top