Why do you integrate expressions for work + (hw problems)?

AI Thread Summary
A single conservative force acting on a 5.00-kg particle is described by the equation Fx = (2x + 4) N. To calculate the work done as the particle moves from x = 1.00 m to x = 5.00 m, integration of the force over the distance is necessary due to the force's variability. The correct calculation yields 40 J, achieved by properly setting the limits of the integral. Additionally, the discussion touches on the concept of integrating work expressions when forces change with distance, emphasizing its importance in physics. The thread concludes with a successful resolution of the initial misunderstanding regarding the integral limits.
Struggle Help
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
PHYSICS FORUMS RULES REQUIRE ONLY ONE PROBLEM POSTED PER THREAD.
Question:
A single conservative force acts on a 5.00-kg particle. The equation Fx = (2x + 4) N, where x is in
meters, describes this force. As the particle moves along the x-axis from x = 1.00 m to x = 5.00 m,
calculate (a) the work done by this force.

Work = Force * Distance.

(2*(5-1) +4) = 12N
12N * 4 = 48J.. (The correct answer is 40J).


If we integrate the equation (?) it results in (4)^2 + 4(4) = 32J (Still wrong answer).

First of all how do you get the right answer?

Second of all (more conceptual) why do you (in general) have to integrate work expressions? In what other situations do you have to integrate equations/ expressions?


Question 2:
A person stands on a scale in an elevator. As the elevator starts, the scale has a constant reading of 591
N. As the elevator later stops, the scale reading is 391 N. Assume the magnitude of the acceleration is
the same during starting and stopping, and determine (a) the weight of the person, (b) the person’s mass,
and (c) the acceleration of the elevator.

a) 491 N
b)50.1kg
c)2m/s^2

a) We can assume the person's weight didn't change, and the magnitude of acceleration is the same during stopping and starting (albeit in different directions I'm assuming).

When the elevator starts 3 forces are affecting the scale, Fg(gravity), Fn (normal force), Fe(force of elevator). When the elevator starts Fe is 100N downwards, and when the elevators stops Fe is 100N upwards. How would I in this situation determine the weight in Newtons of the person? Take the average of the two forces, during stopping and starting?

b) 491N / 9.8m/s^2 = 50/1kg

c)Not sure how to start this.

Question 3:
The Earth rotates about its axis with a period of 24.0 h. Imagine that the rotational speed can be
increased. If an object at the equator is to have zero apparent weight, (a) what must the new period be?
(b) By what factor would the speed of the object be increased when the planet is rotating at the higher
speed?

a)1.41h

b)17.1

This question is really challenging (for me at least) so I really just expect for the teacher to go over it in class. I would appreciate it if you could patch up my misunderstandings in the first two more basic problems I have posted.

This is my first time on this forum so please forgive me for any mistakes or transgressions I may have committed. I would really appreciate any help you may offer me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Struggle Help said:
Question:
A single conservative force acts on a 5.00-kg particle. The equation Fx = (2x + 4) N, where x is in
meters, describes this force. As the particle moves along the x-axis from x = 1.00 m to x = 5.00 m,
calculate (a) the work done by this force.

Work = Force * Distance.

(2*(5-1) +4) = 12N
12N * 4 = 48J.. (The correct answer is 40J).

If we integrate the equation (?) it results in (4)^2 + 4(4) = 32J (Still wrong answer).

First of all how do you get the right answer?

You aren't using the correct limits for your integral, which is why your calculation of work is wrong. Work = integral of Force w.r.t. distance.

Second of all (more conceptual) why do you (in general) have to integrate work expressions?

In this particular case, the amount of force varies with the distance x. If the force were constant, an integral would not be necessary.

In what other situations do you have to integrate equations/ expressions?

It depends. There is no way to answer this vague question.
 
SteamKing said:
You aren't using the correct limits for your integral, which is why your calculation of work is wrong. Work = integral of Force w.r.t. distance.

That makes sense, thanks.

I redid the integral, trying x*(X+4)

5*(5+4) - 1*(1+4) = 40. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top