Why does 1 mole of NaCl contain 1 mole each of Na and Cl?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ihaveabutt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mole
AI Thread Summary
One mole of sodium chloride (NaCl) weighs 58.443 grams and contains 6.022 x 10^23 sodium ions and 6.022 x 10^23 chloride ions. This is because each NaCl molecule consists of one sodium atom and one chloride atom, establishing a 1:1 ratio. Therefore, when you have one mole of NaCl, you inherently have one mole of sodium and one mole of chloride, similar to how a dozen of something contains a dozen of each individual component. The discussion emphasizes that the definition of a mole, represented by Avogadro's number, dictates that for every mole of NaCl, there must be an equal number of Na and Cl atoms. This foundational concept allows for calculations such as weight percentage in compounds, reinforcing the relationship between the number of molecules and their constituent atoms.
ihaveabutt
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
"A mole of sodium chloride is 58.443 g. It will contain 6.022 x 1023 chloride ions and 6.022 x 1023 sodium ions"

Why does one mole of sodium chloride contain both a mole of chloride AND a mole of sodium? Why not half a mole of each?:confused:
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Every NaCl molecules has a Na and a Cl atom. So, if you have 6.022x10^23 molecules, you will have that same number of Na atoms and Cl atoms, and by definition, 1 mole is 6.022x10^23 atoms
 
ihaveabutt said:
"A mole of sodium chloride is 58.443 g. It will contain 6.022 x 1023 chloride ions and 6.022 x 1023 sodium ions"

Why does one mole of sodium chloride contain both a mole of chloride AND a mole of sodium? Why not half a mole of each?:confused:

A mole is a number - like a dozen. It's like asking, "Why does a dozen cats contain a dozen heads and a dozen tails, and not half a dozen of each?"
 
I know what a mole is. But, why does it have to be a mole of each instead of another (equal) number?

Could I have a mole of NaCl with Na and Cl consisting of 1 atom each (for a total of two atoms in the NaCl)? If I have 6.022 x 10^23 of the NaCl (with two atoms total rather than a mole each) would it still be 1 mole of NaCl? or is there some reason I need to have 1 mole of each atom?
 
As phyzguy wrote - if you have dozen cats, they have a dozen heads and dozen tails. If you have a dozen of NaCl molecules, they have a dozen Na and a dozen Cl atoms. If you have a mole of NaCl, it has a mole of Na and a mole of Cl. It can't be any other number, just like dozen cats can't have ten heads, as two of the cats would be not a cats, but decapitated cats.
 
In NaCl, the ratio of Na to Cl to NaCl is 1:1:1.
If you don't believe me look at the equation Na + Cl -> NaCl and look at the coefficients.
A mole is 6.023*10^23. Therefore, if you have a mole of NaCl, multiplying the ratio by the number will give you

6.023*10^23 Na : 6.023*10^23 of Cl : 6.023*10^23 NaCl.

6.023*10^23 atoms of Na = 1 mol of Na.
6.023*10^23 atoms of Cl = 1 mol of Cl.
6.023*10^23 molecules of NaCl = 1 mol of NaCl.

Isn't avagadros number fun! Now you can do some weight percentage problems like: if you had 20g of NaCl, what percent of the weight is due to the presence of sodium.
 
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
Back
Top