Why Does Adding 2π to the Phase Angle Yield Equivalent Solutions in SHM?

AI Thread Summary
In simple harmonic motion (SHM), the phase angle can be determined using the velocity function, where adding 2π to the phase angle yields equivalent solutions. This is because angles differing by multiples of 2π represent the same physical state in SHM, allowing for the same velocity and position. The discussion clarifies that while alternative angles like π - x_rad could be considered, they would imply a change in direction towards equilibrium, which is not the intended interpretation. The correct phase angle ensures that the particle is moving away from equilibrium, maintaining consistency in its state. Thus, any phase angle of the form ω + 2nπ, where n is an integer, indicates the particle is in the same phase.
salman213
Messages
301
Reaction score
1
In simple harmonic motion example there is a question

velocity max is given
velocity at time = 0 is given (which is not equal to maximum velocity --> not at equilibrium point at time=0)
graph is also given of the velocity function

IT asks to find the phase angle

in the solution they use the formula

v(t)=-vmaxsin(\omegat + \varphi)

using vmax and v(0) they solve for \varphi

then they add 2pie to it and say the answer is either x rad or 2pie + xrad (where x is the answer they found)

why do they add this 2pie (i know it has the same value but it can then be k2pie where k is any integer since x rad + 2pie or x rad + 4 pie or x rad + 6pie etc. will also give u the same answer)


any help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a HW question. Anyway, you've given some thought to it. You are right -- adding 2k*pi to any angle makes it the same.

Are you sure they are not saying (pi-x_rad)?
 
no that is also an answer yes but they say it is not the phase angle because if u use the angle u get from pie - x_rad that gives u the angle when the "slope" of the graph is increasing and therefore meaning the direction of the particle moving changes. IT is suppose to be going away from the equilibirum but if u say the phase angle is pie minus xrad then that means its is going towards the equilibrium point.
 
Then it is the simple and correct answer that at phase omega+2n*pi, the particle is in the identical state. You cannot distinguish the state of the particle between any of these states, and that is why it's called to be in the same phase. (Actually, it had been my mistake not to explain to you sooner.)

Suppose a wave is moving. Then all the particles which are in the same phase along the wave are those that that have the angles as 2n*pi + omega, where n is any integer, +ve, -ve or zero. They have the same velocity in the same direction, and are at the same distance from the mean position
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top