Why Does an Aluminium Rod Slow Down When a Current is Produced?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why an aluminum rod slows down when a current is produced. The official explanation states that the current creates a force opposing the rod's motion, leading to deceleration. The participant attempts to clarify this by explaining the relationship between the rod's movement, the magnetic field, and the resulting electron motion. A response corrects the participant's understanding, noting that the electron movement is perpendicular to the rod's motion, resulting in a force that opposes the rod's direction. Ultimately, the interaction between the current and magnetic field is key to understanding the slowing effect.
L89
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a question concerning the attached diagram:
The question which accompanied the diagram is: Why does the aluminium rod (the one that lies across the other two) slow down when a current is produced?

The official answer is: "A current is produced in the rod which experiences a force in an opposite direction to the original motion, therefore slowing down the motion."

However, I do not really understand this and tried to formulate my answer. This is my attempt:

As the rod moves towards the right , its velocity is at 90° to the magnetic field. Thus the electrons in it will have the same velocity. Hence, according to the Left Hand Slap Rule [opposite of RightHSR for positive particles], a magnetic force is exerted on them and they move to the further end of the roller. The closer end becomes positively charged. Meanwhile, this potential difference induces a voltage across the rod thus causing electrons to flow anticlockwise. The two electron motions are opposite, thus the total current is small. Hence the magnetic force exerted on the rod (as current is at 90° to field) is small, and a smaller speed is produced.

MY QUESTION IS THIS: Is my answer correct? If it's not can someone enlighten me?

Help will be appreciated
L89
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no diagram, but this is a standard problem, so I think I get the geometry. The official answer is a more consice way of saying a lot of what you are saying. The part about the motions being opposite is not accurate. When the wire moves the electrons are forced in the direction of the wire. This is perpendicular to, not oopposite, the direction of motion of the wire. The part of their motion in the direction of the wire results in a force that is opposite the direction the wire is moving, so there is a force that opposes the motion of the wire.

The motion of the electrons in the direction of the wire is conveniently described as a current, and the force perpendicular to this current is well known. That is why the official answer uses current to describe the effect.
 
Thanks very much. Yeah, it clicked. Stupid me :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top