Why Does Bell's Calculation Yield a Negative Cosine?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Adam Lewis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bell Derivation Sign
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Adam Lewis
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am trying to reproduce Bell's calculation for the expectation value of paired spin measurements on particles in the singlet state. For unit vectors [itex]\hat{a}[/itex] and [itex]\hat{b}[/itex] we want to calculate

[tex]P(a,b)=<\psi|(\hat{a}\cdot\vec{\sigma})(\hat{b} \cdot \vec{\sigma})|\psi>[/tex]

where [itex]|\psi>[/itex] is the singlet state.

Via the commutation and anticommutation relations for the Pauli matrices the enclosed operator is simply

[tex](\hat{a}\cdot\hat{b})I + \imath\vec{\sigma}\cdot(\hat{a}\times\hat{b}).[/tex]

As a scalar the dot product can be pulled from the bra-ket, leaving [itex](\hat{a}\cdot\hat{b})<\psi|I|\psi>=(\hat{a}\cdot \hat{b})[/itex] since the singlet state is normalized. The cross product's expectation value turns out to vanish. Thus the final answer is

[tex]P(a,b)=(\hat{a}\cdot\hat{b})=\cos(\theta).[/tex]

The answer usually quoted, however, is [itex]-\cos(\theta)[/itex], and I can't figure out where the minus sign is coming from. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, that would get you the minus sign. But I had thought the fact the spins were anti-parallel to be already encoded by the singlet state. It seems odd to me that you should have to insert this information again via the operator. Maybe I'm misunderstanding how [itex]\vec{\sigma}[/itex] is supposed to work?