Why Does Calculating Binomial Probabilities Differ from Simple Outcome Ratios?

AI Thread Summary
Calculating binomial probabilities differs from simple outcome ratios due to the independence of Bernoulli trials and the need to consider all possible sequences of outcomes. While there are 2^n total outcomes for n trials, the binomial distribution focuses on the number of successes, which can range from 0 to n. The probability of a specific number of successes is determined by multiplying the probability of success raised to the number of successes by the probability of failure raised to the number of failures, along with the number of ways to arrange those successes. This leads to the binomial probability formula, which accounts for varying probabilities of success and failure. Understanding these principles clarifies why direct counting of outcomes can lead to incorrect results.
Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement



upload_2017-9-11_16-36-2.png

upload_2017-9-11_15-59-33.png


I am not getting the above.
Let me calculate the probability of getting 2 successes from 5 Bernoulli trials.
There are total 10 possible outcomes as each trial has two possible outcomes.
The probability of getting one success is P(S1) = No. of successes / no. of total possible outcomes
= 5/10 = 1/2
The probability of getting another success = No. of successes / no. of total possible outcomes
= 4/9
So, the probability of getting two successes = 1/2(4/9)= 2/9
This doesn't match the answer given by the binomial distribution formula.
So, what is wrong here?

upload_2017-9-11_16-0-1.png


I couldn't understand how is binomial distribution sum of n independent Bernoulli trials?
If I denote ith trial by ##X_i ##, then how can k i.e. no. of successes be sum of the trials i.e.∑##_i X_i##?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When you say there are 10 possible outcomes in 5 Bernoulli trials you are making a conceptual error. Each trial yields 2 outcomes so there are a total of ##2\cdot 2\cdot 2 ...\cdot 2 = 2^{10}## outcomes when you consider specific sequences. But there are 5+1 = 6 possible outcomes {0,1,2,3,4,5} when you consider the specific values of the binomial random variable K = number of successes might take on.

You're trying to derive the probability of getting 1 success by counting outcomes. Doing that you need to count the ##2^{10}## outcomes if these are each equally probable. Of those you need to count how many yield 1 success. That will be 5 choose 1 = 5 ways BUT this assumes each outcome is equally probable. That would be true if x=1/2 but Bernoulli trials needn't be 50-50. If you're talking coin flips then great. If you're talking winning the lottery vs losing then, this won't work.

You have to use independence of the trials. The derivation is pretty straight forward. In your example of the probability of 1 success you calculate the probability of exactly 1 success in a given sequence. For example in 5 trials getting [success, fail ,fail, fail, fail]. The probability of this will be ##p\cdot q\cdot q\cdot q\cdot q## where ##q=1-p## is the failure probability. You then multiply this by the count of how many rearrangements of the specific sequence there are.

In general you'll find the probability of getting ##k## successes (and ##n-k## failures) in a specific sequence will be ## p^k\cdot (1-p)^{n-k}## and there will be ## n## choose ##k## ways to rearrange that sequence (by choosing which ##k## of the ##n## trials will be the successes).

So the general binomial probability formula is: ##P(n,k) = \frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!} p^k(1-p)^{n-k}##
If you didn't follow my exposition, there's 100's online. Start at Wolfram or Wikipedia, or your textbook.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top