Why Does Calculating the Speed of a Runaway Cable Car Involve Both Masses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mullets1200
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the speed of a runaway cable car involves both the car's mass and the counterweight's mass due to the conservation of energy principles. The cable car descends a 200-meter hill while the counterweight ascends, affecting the overall energy dynamics. The initial calculations for braking force were correct at 3780 N, but the speed calculation for the runaway scenario was flawed. It is essential to consider the kinetic energy of both the cable car and the counterweight when determining the final speed. Properly accounting for both masses leads to an accurate assessment of the system's energy changes.
mullets1200
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The 1990 kg cable car shown in the figure descends a 200-m-high hill. In addition to its brakes, the cable car controls its speed by pulling an 1780 kg counterweight up the other side of the hill. The rolling friction of both the cable car and the counterweight are negligible.

The trangle that this is on is a 30-20-130 triangle. The counter weight is on the 20 degree side while the cable car is on the 30 degree side

1) How much braking force does the cable car need to descend at constant speed?
3780 N

2) One day the brakes fail just as the cable car leaves the top on its downward journey. What is the runaway car's speed at the bottom of the hill?



The Attempt at a Solution


for part 1 i did:
1990*g*sin(30)-1780*g*sin(20)
3780N which was correct

for part 2 i did:
The height dropped on the AB side is 200m
The height gained on the BC side is
200/L=sin(30)
L=200/sin(30)
hbc*sin(30)/200=sin(20)
hbc=200*sin(20)/sin(30)
137 m

m*g*(200-137)=.5*m*v^2
v=sqrt(2*g*63)
35 m/s but it was wrong.

any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mullets1200 said:
m*g*(200-137)=.5*m*v^2

any help?

The cable car and the counter weigth have a different mass, so m*g*(200-137) is
wrong.
You also need to account for the increase in kinect energy of both the car and
the counterweight.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top