(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); why does dimensional regularization need counterterms ??

if all the integrals in 'dimensional regularization' are FINITE why do we need counterterms ?? in fact all the poles of the Gamma function are simple hence the only divergent quantity is the limit as d tends to 4 of

[tex] 1/(d-4) [/tex] which is ONLY a divergent quantity that could be 'absobed' or re-parametered as a divergent universal constant 'a'

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Why does dimensional regularization need counterterms ?

Loading...

Similar Threads - does dimensional regularization | Date |
---|---|

I Mirror fermions / mirror families. How does it work? | Jan 21, 2018 |

I Does gravity just emerge out of all the quantum fields? | Jan 8, 2018 |

I How does gravitation fit into this picture of branes? | Oct 14, 2017 |

What does N-Dimensional mean? | Jun 4, 2011 |

WHY dimensional regularization does not work for Gravity ? | May 25, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**