Why Does Doubling Sound Sources Not Simply Double the Decibel Level?

  • Thread starter Thread starter somecelxis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intensity
AI Thread Summary
Doubling sound sources does not simply double the decibel level because sound intensity is related to the square of amplitude. When two sound waves are perfectly in phase, their amplitudes add, resulting in a 6 dB increase; however, if they are uncorrelated, the intensities add, leading to only a 3 dB increase. The calculation for two sources producing 30 dB each results in a total of 33 dB when considering their uncorrelated nature. The confusion arises from misunderstanding the relationship between amplitude and intensity in sound waves. Therefore, the resultant sound level depends on the correlation of the sources.
somecelxis
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A source prodeuces sound of intensity level of 30dB .If another source prodeuces sound at the same time , what's the resultant level?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



the ans is 10 log (2##I_1## / (##I_0##)) = 33dB , but why not = 10 log (4##I_1## / (##I_0##)) .. beacuse when 2 sound waves superposed , the resultant amplitude is A+A= 2A , I is directly proportional to (A^2) ...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are the two sounds correlated (e.g., in phase) with each other? The sum of the two will only have amplitude A + A (and therefore +6 dB) if they are perfectly in phase with each other. In general they're assumed uncorrelated (they have nothing to do with each other), and so you add the intensities and get +3 dB.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
olivermsun said:
Are the two sounds correlated (e.g., in phase) with each other? The sum of the two will only have amplitude A + A (and therefore +6 dB) if they are perfectly in phase with each other. In general they're assumed uncorrelated (they have nothing to do with each other), and so you add the intensities and get +3 dB.

it's not 3db am i right? the intensity now it's 2I ?
 
33 dB is +3 dB relative to the original 30 dB, right?

Hint: log102 = ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top