Why Does Gauss's Law Give Zero Flux for a Point Charge Inside a Sphere?

AI Thread Summary
Gauss's Law indicates that the electric flux through a sphere surrounding a point charge at its center is non-zero, specifically equal to q/ε₀. The confusion arises when calculating the divergence of the electric field, which results in zero due to the singularity at the charge's location. This issue is addressed by recognizing that point charges are represented by the Dirac delta function, which accounts for the contribution at the origin. When using the delta function in the volume integral, the correct non-zero flux can be derived. Therefore, the divergence calculation must consider the singular nature of the point charge to avoid the erroneous zero flux result.
eok20
Messages
198
Reaction score
0
i know that the flux through a sphere with a point charge at the center is non-zero \left( \frac{q}{\epsilon_0}\right) but if I wanted to calculate this using Guass's law I would take the divergence of E=\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2}\hat{r} which is 0 so I would get the flux to be 0. What am I doing wrong?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem lies in the fact that you are using a point charge. Discontinuities such as these are commonly represented by the Dirac delta function that is defined as follows (for 3 dimensions).

\int_{V} \delta(r) d\tau = 1

where V is any volume that contains the origin. Also;

\delta(r) = 0 for r not equal to 0
\delta(r) = \infty for r equal to 0

The problem is that when you calculate the divergence, it does not include the origin (since at the origin you are effectively dividing by zero). When the charged sphere has a finite radius, this is not a problem, because the contribution from the origin is infinitesimally small. In the case of the point charge however, the entire contribution is coming from the origin, hence the original error.

To fix this, you need to include the Dirac delta function when you calculate the volume integral.

Claude.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top