Why Does Hot Soup Create a Vacuum Effect?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Storm8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hot Vacuum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of a vacuum effect occurring when a bowl of hot soup is covered after being heated in a microwave. Participants explore the underlying physics of why the cover is sucked down instead of being pushed off by the hot, steamy air.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that heated air rises and questions why the cover is sucked down instead of pushed off, suggesting that the cooling air reduces volume according to the ideal gas law.
  • Another participant agrees with the cooling air explanation but adds that steam condensing into water significantly reduces pressure inside the container, contributing to the vacuum effect.
  • A further contribution suggests that both the condensation of steam and the cooling of air play roles in the vacuum effect, leaving it open for others to quantify these effects.
  • One participant draws an analogy to a physics experiment involving a sealed can that implodes as steam condenses, reinforcing the idea of pressure changes due to phase transitions.
  • A later post expresses interest in determining the relationship between the soup's composition and the vacuum pressure created, indicating a desire to explore the limits of this phenomenon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that both cooling air and steam condensation contribute to the vacuum effect, but there is no consensus on the relative importance of each factor or how to quantify them.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the ideal gas law and the behavior of steam and water are present, but these are not fully explored or resolved within the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in thermodynamics, phase transitions, and the behavior of gases and vapors in closed systems may find this discussion relevant.

Storm8
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi this is probably very easy for you guys, but I can't figure this out. Heated air rises right? Then why is it that when I put a bowl of soup in the microwave and heat it in a plactic Tupperware-like container, then remove and cover it -- does a vacuum like effect occur? It would seem to me tha the hot, steamy air would want to push the cover off. Instead it sucks the cover down. Why?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Storm8 said:
Hi this is probably very easy for you guys, but I can't figure this out. Heated air rises right? Then why is it that when I put a bowl of soup in the microwave and heat it in a plactic Tupperware-like container, then remove and cover it -- does a vacuum like effect occur? It would seem to me tha the hot, steamy air would want to push the cover off. Instead it sucks the cover down. Why?

Once you remove it no more air is added. As the air cools down the volume reduces (ideal gas law) - so it sucks down.
 
mathman said:
Storm8 said:
It would seem to me tha the hot, steamy air would want to push the cover off. Instead it sucks the cover down. Why?
Once you remove it no more air is added. As the air cools down the volume reduces (ideal gas law) - so it sucks down.
This is the same reason as to why airbeds can be completely inflated at first but seem to loose air throughout the night. I strangely worked this out in a semi-dream state recently (before looking it up to confirm it). I went away for the weekend and stayed at a friend's on the Friday, his house was well heated and the airbed was fine all night. On Saturday I stayed at a different friend's on the same bed but this friend's house was much colder, halfway through the night I woke up on a partially deflated bed. In my half-dream state I concluded that if it had a puncture it would have deflated all the way and that the inbuilt pump must heat the air it pumps through, thus because of the cold air it had seemed to deflate.
 
mathman said:
Once you remove it no more air is added. As the air cools down the volume reduces (ideal gas law) - so it sucks down.

That's what I thought at first, but I think a larger reason for the effect is that as it cools, the steam inside the container condenses into water. The volume of water is something like 1000x less than steam, so it greatly reduces the pressure inside the container.

When the soup is heated, the fact that hot air rises plays a small part trying to lift the lid. However, a larger part is played by the increased pressure inside, again due to water turning into steam.
 
Lsos said:
That's what I thought at first, but I think a larger reason for the effect is that as it cools, the steam inside the container condenses into water. The volume of water is something like 1000x less than steam, so it greatly reduces the pressure inside the container.

When the soup is heated, the fact that hot air rises plays a small part trying to lift the lid. However, a larger part is played by the increased pressure inside, again due to water turning into steam.
I suspect both factors (water condensation and air cooling) play a role. I'll leave it to others to quantify.
 
Lsos said:
That's what I thought at first, but I think a larger reason for the effect is that as it cools, the steam inside the container condenses into water. The volume of water is something like 1000x less than steam, so it greatly reduces the pressure inside the container.

When the soup is heated, the fact that hot air rises plays a small part trying to lift the lid. However, a larger part is played by the increased pressure inside, again due to water turning into steam.

I believe that you are completely correct. This is analogous to the standard physics experiment in which water is boiled in a large thin-walled tin can (big gas cans are idea) and then sealed. As the steam condenses, the can implodes (slowly)
 
You guys are awesome. Thanks. Now I will try to figure out what the composition of the soup (density) verses water content is required to create x lbs. of vacuum pressure and whether there is a limit or maximum force that can be created.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
Replies
5
Views
3K