Why Does Kinematics Fail in Calculating Fmax in This Physics Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xstetsonx
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Kinematics fails to calculate Fmax in this physics problem because it does not account for the work done by the force over the distance traveled. The correct approach involves using the work-energy principle, where the work done is equal to the change in kinetic energy. The area under the force versus position curve represents the work, not the total force. The integration of force as a function of position is necessary to accurately determine the work done. Thus, the correct method to find Fmax is to use W = ∫ F(x) dx, leading to the accurate answer of 4.8N.
xstetsonx
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
A 400 g particle moving along the x-axis experiences the force shown in Figure Ex11.15. The particle goes from vx = 2.5 m/s at x = 0 m to vx = 5.5 m/s at x = 2 m. What is Fmax?

my solution manual told me to do this with work and energy

but why can't i do
kinematic:
5.5^2=2.5^2+2A2=6

F=ma
(0.4KG)(6m/s^2)=.5Fmax(2)=2.4N
area under the curve--triangle---

but the correct answer is 4.8N...ugh
 

Attachments

  • eq0e4w86.jpg
    eq0e4w86.jpg
    3.6 KB · Views: 514
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait the area underneath the curve is work right and my answer is the total force? ... so i have to do W=(F)(delta X)??
 
If the curve had the force as a function of time then your approach would work.

m(v_2-v_1) = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} F(t) dt

this is simply F=ma integrated

but since it isn't you can't do this and you will have to use

W = \int_{x_1}^{x_2} F(x) \cdot dx
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top