Why Does My Calculation of Maxwellian Gas Velocity Yield an Incorrect Result?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saptarshi Sarkar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of Maxwellian gas velocity, specifically the discrepancy in results for the root mean square (RMS) velocity. The user initially calculated the RMS velocity as (3 + 8/π)kT/m but expected (3 - 8/π)kT/m. Clarification is provided that the average velocity, denoted as ##\bar v##, is indeed zero when considering vector components, but the magnitude of velocity cannot be negative. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between velocity and speed, noting that while the average of the vector components can be zero, the squared terms in the RMS calculation must account for the positive nature of speed. Ultimately, the user gains clarity on the relationship between the average and RMS velocities in a three-dimensional context.
Saptarshi Sarkar
Messages
98
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
Calculate the value of ##<(v-\bar v)²>## for a Maxwellian gas
Relevant Equations
##<(v-\bar v)²> = <v²> + <\bar v²> - 2<v><\bar v>##
I expanded it as shown above and got

##<v²> + <\bar v²> - 2<v><\bar v>## = ##v_{rms}^2 + \bar v^2 = \frac {3kT} m+\frac {8kT} {πm}##

I used ##<v> = 0## as the velocity is equally likely to be positive as it's likely to be negetive.

From the above I get the answer ##\frac {kT} m(3+\frac 8 π)## but, the answer should be ##\frac {kT} m(3-\frac 8 π)##

Please help me understand what I did wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand either answer. What does ##\bar v## represent here? Isn't it the same as ##\langle v \rangle## so should be 0?
 
  • Informative
Likes Saptarshi Sarkar
vela said:
I don't understand either answer. What does ##\bar v## represent here? Isn't it the same as ##\langle v \rangle## so should be 0?

##\bar v## is the average velocity of the molecules in the gas and it is the same as ##<v>##, it would be 0 if the difference was not squared. The term ##<(v - \bar v)^2>## is the Variance of the velocity distribution.
 
So you're saying ##v_{\rm rms}^2 = \frac {3kT}{m} + \frac{8 k T}{\pi m}##? Can you explain how you got that?
 
  • Informative
Likes Saptarshi Sarkar
vela said:
So you're saying ##v_{\rm rms}^2 = \frac {3kT}{m} + \frac{8 k T}{\pi m}##? Can you explain how you got that?

##\frac {3kT}{m}## & ##\frac{8kT}{\pi m}## are respectively the formulas for the square of the RMS and Average velocities of a molecule in a gas according to Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.
 
Saptarshi Sarkar said:
##\frac {3kT}{m}## & ##\frac{8kT}{\pi m}## are respectively the formulas for the square of the RMS and Average velocities of a molecule in a gas according to Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.
How do you reconcile this statement with your earlier statement that the average velocity is 0?
 
  • Informative
Likes Saptarshi Sarkar
vela said:
How do you reconcile this statement with your earlier statement that the average velocity is 0?

I think I understood! ##v## cannot be negetive as it is velocity in 3D (##\vec v = v_x\hat i + v_y\hat j + v_z\hat k##) and it's magnitude must be positive! Only the average of ##v_x,v_y,v_z## would be 0.

Thanks a lot!
 
Saptarshi Sarkar said:
I think I understood! ##v## cannot be negative as it is velocity in 3D (##\vec v = v_x\hat i + v_y\hat j + v_z\hat k##) and its magnitude must be positive! Only the average of ##v_x,v_y,v_z## would be 0.
I think you're working with velocities, not speeds, in this problem. That is, ##v## and ##\bar v## both represent vectors, not the magnitudes. If this is the case, you generally have
$$\langle (v-\bar v)^2 \rangle = \langle (v-\bar v)\cdot (v-\bar v) \rangle = \langle v^2 \rangle - 2\langle v \cdot \bar v \rangle + \langle \bar v^2 \rangle.$$ You can show that
$$\langle v \cdot \bar v \rangle = \langle v \rangle \cdot \bar v = \bar v \cdot \bar v$$
 
  • Like
Likes Saptarshi Sarkar

Similar threads

Back
Top