Why Does OH- Have a Negative Charge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter andyrk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Negative
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the negative charge of the hydroxide ion (OH-), explaining that it arises from the need for oxygen to achieve a stable electron configuration. According to the octet rule, oxygen requires one additional electron to stabilize, resulting in a -1 charge when it combines with a hydrogen ion (H+). The equation O2- + H+ = OH- illustrates this process, where the addition of H+ cancels out one electron from O2-, leaving a net negative charge. The conversation also touches on the distinction between ions and radicals, noting that while ions carry a charge, radicals can be neutral or charged, as exemplified by the superoxide anion. The definition of a radical is clarified to include any species with an unpaired electron, which can be an atom, ion, or molecule.
andyrk
Messages
658
Reaction score
5
Why does the hydroxide ion have a negative charge? , i.e OH-?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Because if not, it would be a hydroxide radical and not an ion?
 
Think octet rule and lewis dot structures... you need one more electron to make the oxygen stable, so it has a 1- charge.
 
andyrk said:
Why does the hydroxide ion have a negative charge? , i.e OH-?
The simplest way for explaining this is this:
O2-+H+=(OH)- (It's actually (OH)-)

This is not stable(Stable form is H2O)

Here H+ Cancels out one electron of O2-

So one electron is left.Therefore it is left with a negative charge
-2+1=-1
:wink:
 
andyrk said:
Why does the hydroxide ion have a negative charge? , i.e OH-?

Count the number of protons and number of electron in the ion.
With reference to what Drdu said: ions are charged, radicals are neutral.
:smile:chemistry sometimes overcomplicates things to simplify them...
 
Enigman said:
Count the number of protons and number of electron in the ion.
With reference to what Drdu said: ions are charged, radicals are neutral.
:smile:chemistry sometimes overcomplicates things to simplify them...

Radicals need not always be neutral.

See: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2644638/

Also you can have stuff like the superoxide anion which is a anion radical. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superoxide

Plenty of examples around, these are just off the top of my head.
 
Yanick said:
Radicals need not always be neutral.

See: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2644638/

Also you can have stuff like the superoxide anion which is a anion radical. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superoxide

Plenty of examples around, these are just off the top of my head.

Sorry for not being clearer, I was talking about hydroxyl radicals which DrDu mentioned rather than radicals in general.
As for the definition of radical I believe the only prerequisite is having an unpaired electron/ incompletely filled valence shell and the species in question may be an atom, ion or a molecule.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top