Why Does Parallel Radiation to Magnetic Fields Exhibit Circular Polarisation?

hhhmortal
Messages
175
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of charge 'q' and energy 'E' which experiences an acceleration 'a', emits electromagnetic radiation.

Show that the radiation from this particle which is emitted parallel to the magnetic field is expected to exhibit circular polarisation.



The Attempt at a Solution



I started by saying the cross product of external B with B component of the radiation are perpendicular (i.e. 90°) and because of this the radiation will be circular polarised.

But this answer seems to be very simple..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Circular polarization means the E and B fields are rotating. You never mentioned in your explanation anything about rotation. Also you really need to explain the problem better or show a picture.

Right now I am assuming this is a charged particle traveling in a circle due to a magnetic field in the z-direction. Also knowing the direction of the acceleration vector, you can find the directions of E and B, and show they are circularly polarized and transverse to the z-axis in the far-field. This is assuming I have the right picture.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top