Why Does Phylogeny Predict a Hierarchical Classification System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SAT2400
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Phylogeny predicts a hierarchical classification system because it reflects the evolutionary relationships between organisms, illustrating how descendants branch from common ancestors. The discussion emphasizes that option A is the most appropriate answer, as it aligns with the concept of a phylogenetic tree, where organisms are categorized based on shared ancestry. The relevance of structural forms and naming conventions in options C and E is debated, with concerns about their applicability across different species and traits. The importance of understanding these relationships is highlighted, as they provide insight into the classification of life forms. Overall, a clear understanding of phylogenetic relationships is essential for accurate biological classification.
SAT2400
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
1 Question! (Phylogeny) HELP PLEASE~!

Homework Statement


QUestion:
Phylogeny predicts a hierarchical classification system because
v

Homework Equations


related to descendents and ancestors..

The Attempt at a Solution


A talks about structural form, C is like naming? either C or E is the answer...but which is the best answer? and WHY? Please help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


This is the "Introductory Physics" section of the Homework Help area, i.e. your post is in the wrong place. I've sent a note to the moderators to have your post moved to the "Other Sciences" section where it is more likely to be seen by somebody who actually knows about biology. In the future, if you have homework help questions about biology, chemistry, or any scientific subject that is NOT physics, math, or engineering, then please post it in the Other Sciences section.
 


I'd say A seems to be the best answer. C doesn't make sense to me: just because organisms have cells in tissues in organs doesn't mean they are related. E... I don't think it is universally applicable - it depends how far you go back and what features you look at. I mean look at mammals, they don't have all the same functions nor live in the same habitats.
A makes sense: phylogeny is like a tree - the organisms on the twigs (the descendents) of a small branch (the common ancestor) will always be joined to a larger branch (the more ancient common ancestor).
 

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

How are ancestors classified in a cladistic system?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Al has higher 2nd ionisation energy — why?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Parallel-ish Theories Terminology
Replies
4
Views
1K
Predict the hybridization and geometry of the indicated atom
Replies
2
Views
3K
How Do You Name Bicyclic Compounds Using IUPAC Nomenclature?
Replies
8
Views
2K
I need assistance with Classical Elements
Replies
1
Views
1K
Why does a Phospholipid have an unsaturated fatty acid tail?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Question on entropy in adiabatic phase change
Replies
8
Views
3K
Does 2-Methyl-2-Pentene Have Stereoisomers?
Replies
3
Views
4K
Why is Pure Water Most Soluble for AgCl?
Replies
1
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top