Why Does Potential Become Zero at 2a in Graph D?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding why the electric potential becomes zero at a distance of 2a in Graph D. The user initially approached the problem using the point charge formula but struggled with the implications of potential contributions from both inner and outer spheres. They noted that the potential should theoretically become more negative as one approaches the outer sphere, suggesting a vertical asymptote instead of reaching zero. However, the application of Gauss's Law clarified that the net electric field outside the two spheres is indeed zero, leading to the conclusion that the potential must also be zero at that point. Ultimately, the user gained clarity on why Graph D is the correct representation of the situation.
RoboNerd
Messages
410
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


Untitled.jpg


Homework Equations


I know that potential from a point charge equals kq/r and that potential difference equals - (integral of)(E dot dl)

The Attempt at a Solution

I tried to approach this problem using the point charge approach by comparing the relative values of kq/r for each sphere and then guessing which graph works from there.

I understand why there is the same potential from 0 < r < a for the right answer D, but I do not understand why the potential becomes 0 at 2a as we at 2a get a negative potential from the outer sphere that is much larger than that of the potential contributed by the inner sphere as we get infinitely closer and closer to the outer sphere, meaning that the potential should have a vertical asymptote at 2a with it becoming more negative (such as in C).

Could anyone please explain why this is the case with D being the right answer? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there an electric field in the region outside the two spheres? What does Gauss's Law have to say about this?
 
Gausses law says that the net electric field with radius greater than 2a is greater than 0, so that explains why there is a zero net electric field.

I see now why D is the right answer, thanks very much
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top