Why Does Reactivity Increase Down a Group in the Periodic Table?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hiuting
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemical
AI Thread Summary
Chemical reactivity increases down a group in the periodic table primarily due to the atomic radius and the effect of electron shielding. As one moves down a group, the outer electrons are held less tightly by the nucleus, making them easier to transfer during chemical reactions. This decreased attraction results in higher reactivity. The comparison between elements like iodine and fluorine illustrates this trend, as iodine is more reactive than fluorine despite being lower in the group. Overall, the relationship between atomic structure and reactivity is crucial for understanding chemical behavior.
hiuting
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Why does the chemical reactivity increase as we go down in a group?


Homework Equations


none


The Attempt at a Solution


I know it has to do with the atomic radius... but I'm not sure :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because as you go down a group, electrons are held less tightly (less shielding), and since reactions result from the transfer of electrons, reactivity will increase.
 
plexus0208 said:
Because as you go down a group, electrons are held less tightly (less shielding), and since reactions result from the transfer of electrons, reactivity will increase.


thanks :) I can't believe I didn't think of that.
 
plexus0208 said:
Because as you go down a group, electrons are held less tightly (less shielding), and since reactions result from the transfer of electrons, reactivity will increase.

That's especially true if you compare iodine with fluorine.

If you have not realized - this comment is intended to be sarcastic.

--
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top