Why Does Solving Laplace's Equation in a Square Yield an Infinite Sum?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving Laplace's equation in a square with side length 1, where the user initially attempts to apply superposition but encounters an infinite sum. The boundary conditions provided are initially incorrect, leading to confusion in the solution process. After clarification, the user corrects the boundary conditions, which are essential for determining the relevant equations. The conversation emphasizes the need to properly identify and apply the correct boundary conditions to achieve a finite solution. Accurate boundary conditions are crucial for resolving the infinite sum issue in the context of Laplace's equation.
cgmeytanperos
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



i need to solve the laplace equation in square with length side 1 i tried to solve by superposition and i got infinite sum enen thouth i know that the answer should be finite

Homework Equations



1.ψ(x=0,0≤y≤1)=0
2.ψ(y=0,0≤x≤1)=0
3.ψ(x=1,0≤y≤1)=10sin(∏*y)+3x
4.ψ(y=1,0≤x≤1)=9sin(2∏*y)+3x

The Attempt at a Solution


from 1 and to 2 have (by superposition):
ψ n=Asin(n∏x)sinh(n∏y) or ψ n=Asin(n∏y)sinh(n∏x)
and after multiply by sin(n∏x)
A n=2∫((9sin(2∏x)+3x)*sin(n∏x))/sinh(n∏) (the integral from 0 to 1)
the problem is that i heve the infinite sum from ∫3x*sin(n∏x)
thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello cg, and welcome to PI.
Are you sure your relevant equations are relevant equations ? They look like boundary conditions to me.
In that case, filling in x=1 changes 10sin(∏*y)+3x to 10sin(∏*y)+3 and 9sin(2∏*y)+3x changes into 3x.
And then the relevant eqations still have to be found out ...
 
hi BvU and thanks.
you were right this is boundry conditions and they are also incorrect (i am sorry)
3.ψ(x=1,0≤y≤1)=10sin(∏*y)+3y
4.ψ(y=1,0≤x≤1)=9sin(2∏*x)+3x
 
And then the relevant eqations still have to be found out ... What do you have available ?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top