Why Does Solving Laplace's Equation in a Square Yield an Infinite Sum?

cgmeytanperos
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



i need to solve the laplace equation in square with length side 1 i tried to solve by superposition and i got infinite sum enen thouth i know that the answer should be finite

Homework Equations



1.ψ(x=0,0≤y≤1)=0
2.ψ(y=0,0≤x≤1)=0
3.ψ(x=1,0≤y≤1)=10sin(∏*y)+3x
4.ψ(y=1,0≤x≤1)=9sin(2∏*y)+3x

The Attempt at a Solution


from 1 and to 2 have (by superposition):
ψ n=Asin(n∏x)sinh(n∏y) or ψ n=Asin(n∏y)sinh(n∏x)
and after multiply by sin(n∏x)
A n=2∫((9sin(2∏x)+3x)*sin(n∏x))/sinh(n∏) (the integral from 0 to 1)
the problem is that i heve the infinite sum from ∫3x*sin(n∏x)
thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello cg, and welcome to PI.
Are you sure your relevant equations are relevant equations ? They look like boundary conditions to me.
In that case, filling in x=1 changes 10sin(∏*y)+3x to 10sin(∏*y)+3 and 9sin(2∏*y)+3x changes into 3x.
And then the relevant eqations still have to be found out ...
 
hi BvU and thanks.
you were right this is boundry conditions and they are also incorrect (i am sorry)
3.ψ(x=1,0≤y≤1)=10sin(∏*y)+3y
4.ψ(y=1,0≤x≤1)=9sin(2∏*x)+3x
 
And then the relevant eqations still have to be found out ... What do you have available ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top