Why Does Sulfur Take Two Electrons from Calcium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bond Elements
AI Thread Summary
Sulfur has a higher electronegativity than calcium, allowing it to take two electrons from calcium to achieve a stable octet configuration, resulting in Ca's +2 charge and S's -2 charge. The discussion clarifies that the notation with dots and brackets represents the grouping of atoms and their electrons, aiding in understanding charge and electron distribution. For bromine to achieve stability, it only needs to gain one electron from magnesium, leading to the formation of two bromide ions. The confusion about the number of electrons and dots around bromine is addressed by emphasizing that each bromine atom gains one electron, resulting in a stable octet without needing to count d electrons. The octet rule serves as a simplification, as d electrons do not participate in bonding in this context.
transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2290/84419342em1.th.gif

in case A:
S has a bigger electonegative energy then Ca
so it will "take" 2 electrons from Ca inorder to be a complete gas like (Ar)

so i know why there is +2 on Ca and -2 on S .

Ca has after perfect gas 4S^2
S =[Ne]3s^2 3P^4
but there are dots and cols what they mean??

regarding B:
for Br to become a perfect gas like(Kr)
it needs to take only one electron
why there is -2 ??
and what are all the dots nere it and cols []??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Eight dots as octet (eight electrons) on the valence shell.

[] just groups atom and electrons together, so that when you write [Ca]<sup>2+</sup> or [Ca:]<sup>0+</sup> it is obvious that charge is that of the atom and the electrons together.

Where do you see -2? There are two Br<sup>-</sup> anions (each with its own octet), that gives -2 in all, but there is no individual entity with this charge in the magnesium bromide.
 
on case A
the formula for S is [Ne]3S^2 3p^4

from where in this formula i can see that there is 8 electrons on the valence shell??
 
For S2- it becomes [Ne]3s23p6 - hence the octet. [Ne]3s23p4 is a neutral S atom.
 
ok i understand case A

regarding case B:
Mg=[Ne]3s^2 so it has 2 electrons on the
valence shell before the merging.

Br=[Ar]3d^10 4s^2 4p^5
so it has 17 electrons on the
valence shell before the merging.

after the merging Br needs to take 1 electron from Mg to become neutral gas.

and for Mg to become a neutral gas we need to take 2 electrons
so we link two Br atoms

but why they present 8 dots around Br??

before it was 17 then we add 2 so we have 19
but 2*8=16

??
 
transgalactic said:
but why they present 8 dots around Br??

To get stable octet.

before it was 17 then we add 2 so we have 19
but 2*8=16

??

We don't add two electrons. We add one electron to each of the two Br atoms. You have to treat each atom separately.

d electrons can be in this case ignored, they don't play any role.
 
Last edited:
regarding case B:
before Br has 17 electrons
after the reaction each Br gets 1 electron
so each Br must have 18 electrons

but in the solution
they have only 5
??
 
Picture is fuzzy, but they have 8, just like sulfur. : on the left, : on the right (it is "Br:", not "Br."), two above and two below.
 
ok even if its 8
before Br has 17 electrons
after the reaction each Br gets 1 electron
so each Br must have 18 electrons

but in the solution
they have only 8

its not 18
??
 
  • #10
I have already explained: d electrons are ignored, they don't play any role.
 
  • #11
why egnoring
D

??
3d^10 4s^2 4p^5

they do play a role
they all
are on the
valence shell
 
  • #12
Octet rule is only a simplification. Obviously it can't work for any atom where d electrons take part in the boding, as there are 10 of them and octet calls for 8 electrons.

In this particular case s&p electrons are enough to explain what is going on, d electrons are not involved - they sit on their orbitals untouched.
 
  • #13
thanks
:)
 
Back
Top