Why Does the Entropy Formula for a Fermionic Gas Include a Degeneracy Factor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kara386
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degeneracy Gas
Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The question asked me to show that the entropy of a fermionic gas is
##S = -k_B \Sigma_i (1-f_i)\ln(1-f_i) +f_i\ln(f_i)##

Using the Fermi-Dirac distribution so ##f_i = \frac{n_i}{g_i}##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The number of microstates ##\Omega## is
##\Omega =## Π##\frac{g_i!}{n_i!(g_i-n_i)!}## and using ##S = k_B ln(\Omega)## I've arrived at the expression:
##S = -k_B \Sigma_i g_i (1-f_i)\ln(1-f_i) +f_i\ln(f_i)##
So there's an unwanted factor of ##g_i##. I'm told it is meant to be there, and I need to explain why it can be set to 1. Something to do with i being the state index and a quantum state can't be degenerate. Could someone explain that to me? Any help is much appreciated! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Kara386

First observation here is that you need some big brackets in your equations - for example in your first equation, the k_B should be multiplying everything, not just the first term.

The business with the g_i is just bookkeeping. In their formula they're using the index i to label different states, and in your formula you're using the index i to label different energies. Your formula includes a g_i factor in it to allow for the possibility that there might be lots of states with the same energy.
 
  • Like
Likes Kara386
Oxvillian said:
Hi Kara386

First observation here is that you need some big brackets in your equations - for example in your first equation, the k_B should be multiplying everything, not just the first term.

The business with the g_i is just bookkeeping. In their formula they're using the index i to label different states, and in your formula you're using the index i to label different energies. Your formula includes a g_i factor in it to allow for the possibility that there might be lots of states with the same energy.
Thanks! I thought that might be it, because although originally the sum was over multiple states taken to be at the same energy, I think the introduction of the average ##f_i## allows the sum to be over individual states.

Thanks for your help!
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top