Why Does the Factor of 1/2 Appear in Dynamic Pressure Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
The factor of 1/2 in dynamic pressure calculations arises from the integration of velocity squared in the context of fluid dynamics. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding derivatives and anti-derivatives, particularly in relation to the equation for dynamic pressure. It emphasizes that integrating each side of the equation requires accounting for a constant of integration to specify initial conditions. The conversation also notes that neglecting this constant can lead to incorrect interpretations, such as equating static and dynamic pressure to zero instead of recognizing total pressure. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate calculations in physics and engineering.
malindenmoyer
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Please refer to this website: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/dynpress.html"

In the "Simplify" step, where does the factor of 1/2 come from? I must be missing something simple...

Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the derivative of d(u^2)/dx? How does that differ from the second term in the 'algebra step'?
This relates to the concept of anti-derivative and integration. Have you studied that yet?
 
I get it now--I'm not used to a 'physicist's' calculus. Would it be proper to simply multiply each side of the original equation by 'dx' and integrate each side with the respective variables? This leaves (r*u^2)/2=-p -> (r*u^2)/2+p=0

Is there a reason why this method is not preferable?
 
Maybe to re-inforce that a constant of integration is required to specify an initial condition? The method you used does not account for the 'constant' as you have the static + dynamic pressure equal to zero instead of the 'total pressure".

Remember, indefinite integrals require a constant of integration.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
214
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top