Why Does the Same Current Flow Through Every Segment of a Wire?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deepankvora
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt Electricity
deepankvora
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Curent Electricity Doubt! PLEASE HELP!

Homework Statement


I did not understand one thing.. If it is given that a wire has a current 'i', then why do we say (in applications of laws such as biot savart law) that the current in a small element of the wire is also 'i', that is the same current that passes through the whole conductor.


Homework Equations


can someone explain this. i got really confused on this one.


The Attempt at a Solution


I thought we should take current in the ' dl ' element of the wire as ' di ' and not i. I am wrong. Please Explain, anyone!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Current is \frac{dQ}{dt}, the amount of charge which passes through a cross-section of the wire per unit time. This value does not depend on the length segment of wire.

Also, for one segment of wire to have a different current than another causes a buildup of charge, inconsistent with Kirchhoff's junction rule.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top