What Causes the String to Break in Different Physics Demonstrations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter danielI
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Break String
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics behind why different strings break in physics demonstrations involving mass and tension. It highlights that the tension in the strings varies based on how quickly the force is applied; when pulled rapidly, the lower string breaks due to inertia, while a slower pull allows the top string to reach its breaking point first. Participants clarify that the acceleration of the masses affects the tension experienced by each string, with calculations provided to illustrate the forces involved. The conversation also touches on misconceptions about constant force and acceleration in the systems being analyzed. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding tension and inertia in these physics demonstrations.
danielI
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
At the end of this lesson. http://mfile.akamai.com/7870/rm/mit...870/8/8.01/f99/videolectures/wl99lec6-300k.rm
Why does the lower string break, and then the upper and finally the lower one again?
Has it anything to do with the speed he is pulling with?

Look at the picture below. The acceleration of the following systems are different (1 =1.4 m/s^2 and 2 = 3.27m/s^2). Is this any related to the result with the string?
Also, why does it give different answers for the two systems in the picture?

Cheers
 

Attachments

  • systems.PNG
    systems.PNG
    1.8 KB · Views: 903
Physics news on Phys.org
I am unable to view the lesson in the link you provided, so I can't comment on it. (Why not just describe it?)

danielI said:
Also, why does it give different answers for the two systems in the picture?
The string tension is different for each system.

In the left picture, a 200 kg mass hangs from the string. What's the tension in the string? (Hint: It's not equal to the weight of the mass!)
 
Great video lecture.
Anyway, the answer involves inertia.

When pulled fast, the lower string breaks because it cannot move the 2kg mass downwards as fast as the downward extension of the string. Thus, something must "give", in this case the string.

However, when pulled slowly, the 2kg mass is pulled about as fast as the lower string is being pulled, but the top string is being critically extended.
 
Doc Al, My first theory regarding the picture was that 1 will accelerate but not system 2 since the 150kg cylinder is being pulled with a constan force. But this is wrong.

I know how to calculate system 1.

T - 150*9,81 = 150a
200*9,81 - T = 200a
+
=> a = 1.401m/s^2 => T = 1681,65N

And the second one ... Oh, I just came up with the answer as I speak (write).:smile:
T = 200*9,81.

pallidin,
My first guess was that when pulling fast his hand is accelerating, while it isn't (almost) accelerating when pulling the thing slowly. So, am I correct to say that if he accelerates faster that g the lower one will break (because of inertia). Did I understand you?

Cheers!
 
danielI said:
Doc Al, My first theory regarding the picture was that 1 will accelerate but not system 2 since the 150kg cylinder is being pulled with a constan force. But this is wrong.
Why in the world would you think that just because the 150 kg mass is being pulled with a constant force that it wouldn't accelerate? (By the way, in both cases the 150 kg mass is being pulled with a constant force. :wink: )

I know how to calculate system 1.

T - 150*9,81 = 150a
200*9,81 - T = 200a
+
=> a = 1.401m/s^2 => T = 1681,65N

And the second one ... Oh, I just came up with the answer as I speak (write).:smile:
T = 200*9,81.
Looks like you figured it out.

pallidin,
My first guess was that when pulling fast his hand is accelerating, while it isn't (almost) accelerating when pulling the thing slowly. So, am I correct to say that if he accelerates faster that g the lower one will break (because of inertia). Did I understand you?
The acceleration due to gravity has nothing to do with this.

By pallidin's description, I understand that this is the standard demo of a mass hanging from a string with a second string hanging down from the mass. Here's another way to look at it. (Just another way of saying what pallidin already explained.) When you pull the string slowly, the mass has plenty of time to move and stretch the top string: the tension in the top string equals the tension in the bottom string plus the weight of the mass. So the top string reaches its breaking point first.

But when you pull the string sharply, it will stretch to its breaking point long before the mass can move enough to stretch the top string (due to the mass's inertia).
 
  • Like
Likes Sho Kano
The reason I thought so was because the 200kg mass accelerates and so would the 150kg mass.
While the 200*9,81 force in system 2 doesn't do that. Ofcourse there is some logical error with my reasoning.

Also, here are all the videos.
http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-01Physics-IFall1999/VideoLectures/index.htm

The lectures are good for self-study and fun to watch. Like at the end of lecture 8 (Friction) :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top