Why Does the Van der Waals Equation Adjust Pressure Up and Volume Down?

AI Thread Summary
The Van der Waals equation modifies pressure and volume to account for real gas behavior, differing from the ideal gas law. The adjustment of volume down reflects the finite size of gas molecules, which occupy space. Conversely, pressure is adjusted up to account for intermolecular attractions that effectively reduce the pressure exerted by the gas. When comparing measurements with a = 0 and a > 0, the presence of attractive forces increases the observed pressure, necessitating the upward adjustment in the equation. Understanding these adjustments is crucial for accurately modeling real gas behavior.
Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Why does the Van der Waals equation adjust pressure up and volume down?

Homework Equations



(P + a)(V-b) = nRT (overly simplified, but it gets the point across).

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay. Volume refers to total free volume in a container in the context of the gas law. I can understand why volume is adjusted down relative to the ideal gas law equation (PV = nRT). Gases aren't point masses and actually occupy some volume.

However, why is pressure adjusted up? Gas molecules may attract and participate in inelastic collisions. This would seem to decrease the actual pressure. Why then would pressure need to be adjusted up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Qube said:
Gas molecules may attract and participate in inelastic collisions. This would seem to decrease the actual pressure.
If you were to measure the pressure of a gas with ##a = 0##, and then, with everything else the same, with ##a > 0##, how would the measurements differ?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top