MHB Why does this proportion work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathgeek7365
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
mathgeek7365
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
In this diagram, triangleXYZ is inscribed into the circles. O is the center of the larger circle. OZ=x, altitude XO=x-5, and OY=x-9. angleXOZ and angleXOY are both right angles. Using the two similar right triangles OYX, and OXZ, this proportion can be written: OY/OX=OX/OZ
Then: (x-9)/(x-5)= (x-5)/x

My daughter wants to know why this works. How was this proportion written, why it works and how we know triangleOYX is similar to triangleOXZ? We appreciate any information as to why this works.

View attachment 5133
 

Attachments

  • image.gif
    image.gif
    2.9 KB · Views: 78
Mathematics news on Phys.org
By Thales' theorem, $\angle{YXZ}=90^\circ$. As $\angle{XYO}+\angle{XZO}=90^\circ$ and $\angle{XYO}+\angle{YXO}=90^\circ$, $\angle{XZO}=\angle{YXO}$ and triangles $OYX$ and $OXZ$ are similar.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top