Why Does Using High Voltages in Power Transmission Reduce Losses?

AI Thread Summary
Using high voltages in power transmission reduces losses primarily because it allows for lower currents, which minimizes power loss according to the formula P = I squared R. Although substituting I=V/R into P=VI suggests that increasing voltage could lead to greater losses, this is misleading in practical applications. In reality, high voltage lines feed transformers with much higher impedance, resulting in most of the voltage being across the transformer rather than the transmission line itself. Consequently, the effective voltage across the line remains low, mitigating losses. Understanding the relationship between voltage, current, and resistance is crucial for grasping why high voltage transmission is efficient.
paul_harris77
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
We are constantly told at school that in order to reduce power loss in overhead cables, high voltages and low currents are used as P = I squared R. This seems to make sense until you substitute I=V/R into P=VI and get P = V squared / R. Now if voltage is increased in the cable, and resistance is decreased, power loss is at its greatest, completely opposite to the other example. Am I doing something wrong?:confused:

Many thanks

Paul Harris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
paul_harris77 said:
We are constantly told at school that in order to reduce power loss in overhead cables, high voltages and low currents are used as P = I squared R. This seems to make sense until you substitute I=V/R into P=VI and get P = V squared / R. Now if voltage is increased in the cable, and resistance is decreased, power loss is at its greatest, completely opposite to the other example. Am I doing something wrong?:confused:

Many thanks

Paul Harris

What you're saying would be true if the high power line were shorted to ground and all the voltage were across the line. In practice the line feeds a transformer with an impedance much higher than the line. So in reality most of the voltage is across the transformer and the voltage across the line is very low.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top