Why Does Voltage Drop When a Dielectric Is Inserted in a Capacitor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monts
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dielectric parts
Monts
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This was done on my Physics II class, ans the Professor has'nt want to explain it to usA 2 Circular Metallic Plate Capacitor, maybe of a diameter of 15cm, was connected to a constant sourch of DC voltage until it was charge to 10Volt, after this the source was DISCONNECTED from the Capacitor, and of course the voltage on it remained at 10V

Then, the professor took a DRY plastic racket with 500ml of water INSIDE, and puts it between the plates, leaving no space between them, it was very precise, the plates where adjusted to the specific width of the racket. By doing this the voltage went down to 4V

And then, he takes the racket out the Capacitor, bringing the voltage back to 10V, and empties all the water and closes the little overture. After this he put the racket back between the plates and the voltage comes down to 4volts AGAIN.

Homework Equations



Why does the change of the Dielectric makes no difference?

The Attempt at a Solution



The water leaving the racket gives up a large quantity of ions, making the air so conductive to the field as it was before
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the formula for capacitance with dielectric constant ε?

What is ε for water and for air?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top