for anyone who was truly interested in the answer.. i found it on http://www.straightdope.com/columns/040116.html
Dear Cecil:
I've heard of this before, but didn't believe it. Now I've seen it for myself, and my
skeptical mind needs a good explanation. A lady in front of me at the supermarket swiped
her credit card but it didn't work. She tried again, didn't work. The cashier tried,
didn't work. So far, everything was proceeding scientifically. Then the cashier says, "My
friend who works at a bank taught me this." What's he do? He puts the credit card in a
plastic shopping bag, pulls the plastic tight around the card, and swipes it. Now the
part I don't get: It worked. --Tim, Newton, Massachusetts
Cecil replies:
At least the cashier's friend didn't tell him to bury the card at a crossroads at
midnight. Wacky though the plastic-bag technique seems, several of Cecil's engineering
buddies admit they've seen it work. Here's the deal. Standard bank cards use the F2F
(Aiken biphase) modulation scheme, in which flux reversals encoded in the . . . eh, too
much information. Let's just say that when you swipe the card through the reader, the
magnetized particles in its stripe generate a signal with "ticks" in it at intervals that
the machine is able to interpret as digital ones or zeros. A scratch or other defect in
the magnetic stripe can cause a spike (i.e., brief fluctuation) in the signal that a
too-sensitive reader will interpret as a tick, meaning that the encoded data will fail
the parity check (the numbers won't add up right) and the card won't work. Wrapping the
card in plastic increases the distance between the read head and the magnetic stripe,
thus reducing the strength and crispness of the signal and smoothing out anomalous
fluctuations. Behold, the card works. Worth a try, anyway--God forbid the clerk should
have to punch in the numbers by hand.
--CECIL ADAMS