Why doesn't a dineutron system form a bound state?

zahero_2007
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Why doesn't a dineutron system form a bound state?

Why doesn't 2 neutrons with one spin up and the other spin down form a bound state but a neutron and proton with both spin up or down form a bound state
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Another question , Is the binding energy per nucleon (assuming A is small enough) stronger for a p-n nucleus with one spin up and the other spin down than a p-n nucleus with both spin up or down?
 


Of the possible bound states for two nucleons, the ground state is 1H2, so a state of two neutrons would decay to this via the weak force.
 


Ok , but Why doesn't the 2 neutrons form a ground state?
 


Because of the spin and isospin symmetry properties of the nucleon-nucleon force.

If I remember correctly wer had this discussion here a coupleof times; please search for "dineutron" or something like that.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
126
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top