Why doesn't Gaus's law count for charges outside the area?

AI Thread Summary
Gauss's law focuses on the net electric flux through a closed surface, which only considers the charges enclosed within that surface. Charges outside the surface do not contribute to the net flux because their electric field lines enter and exit the surface, resulting in a net contribution of zero. The law is derived from the relationship between electric field and charge, emphasizing that only enclosed charges affect the flux calculation. This principle allows for accurate calculations of the electric field despite the presence of external charges. Understanding Gauss's law in terms of flux clarifies why it remains effective for determining electric fields in various scenarios.
Jae
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
In Gaus's law when the integral is set up, we don't account for the charge outside the closed area. Why is this? How does this law work when the charges outside are not accounted for and only the charges enclosed is in the equation? I need an explanation why Gaus's law still works for calculating electric field when there are charges outside. This has been confusing me.

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The flux going into the surface from any outside charge necessarily exits the surface. Since Gauss's law takes into account the net flux through the surface, we can add up the individual contributions, and the net contribution from the outside charges will be 0.
 
It may help to think about this in terms of flux. Imagine you have a single positive charge inside a closed surface. Its field lines extend radially and pass through the surface, so the flux is related to the charge inside. Field lines of a charge outside the surface do not contribute to the flux because its field lines go through one side and out the other, the surface isn't a closed surface for it. The left side of Gauss's law IS the equation for flux and therefore only pertains to charges within the closed surface, which is why it requires a surface integral.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top