Why Don't Neutral Mesons Annihilate Immediately?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ant92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Meson Neutral
Ant92
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have been learning about quarks which is really interesting, but i have become confused when it comes to mesons. I have learned the basics of annhilation, particle and anti-particle, etc, but I have learned that neutral mesons, such as the pi neutral meson are made of a quark, (e.g. up), and its corresponding anti-particle, (e.g. anti-up), so why do the particles join together to form the meson, shouldn't the particles annhilate?

Pi+ meson= up quark, anti-down quark
Pi neutral meson= up quark, anti-up quark/ down quark, anti-down quark
Pi- meson= down quark, anti-up quark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ant92 said:
I have been learning about quarks which is really interesting, but i have become confused when it comes to mesons. I have learned the basics of annhilation, particle and anti-particle, etc, but I have learned that neutral mesons, such as the pi neutral meson are made of a quark, (e.g. up), and its corresponding anti-particle, (e.g. anti-up), so why do the particles join together to form the meson, shouldn't the particles annhilate?

...apparently this is why we don't see a lot of Pi mesons around on a day to day basis... the lifetime of the Pi is pretty short (or long depending on what you compare it to)...

The situation is *similar* (I stress similar because the analogy is quite imperfect, yet perhaps helpful) with "positronium" in which a positron and an electron can briefly form a bound state. But, they eventually annihilate.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top