Why F = m * a? vs Why not F = m + a?

  • Thread starter Thread starter optics.tech
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation F = m * a is fundamentally rooted in the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration, emphasizing that these quantities cannot be simply added together like apples and oranges. The discussion highlights the importance of dimensional analysis, noting that combining mass and acceleration requires careful consideration of units to maintain mathematical validity. While alternative formulations could theoretically exist with constants, they would not hold the same empirical significance as Newton's second law. Ultimately, the validity of F = m * a is supported by experimental evidence rather than arbitrary mathematical manipulation. This underscores the principle that physical laws are derived from observed phenomena rather than mere mathematical convenience.
optics.tech
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
Why F = m * a?

Why not F = m + a?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Adding acceleration and mass is just like adding apples and oranges, it can't be done.

Look at the units involved and combine them in a manner which makes sense.
 
Of course, it would be (mathematically) possible to have something like F= C_1mz+ C_2a where C_1 and C_2 are constants with the correct units (C_1 would have to have units of "Newtons per kg" or "meters per second squared" and C_2 has units of "Newtons-seconds square per meter" or "kilograms".

But the only good Physics explanation as to why a specific formula is true is "that is what the experimental evidence shows".
 
From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion

"Newton's original Latin reads:
Lex II: Mutationem motus proportionalem esse vi motrici impressae, et fieri secundum lineam rectam qua vis illa imprimitur.
This was translated quite closely in Motte's 1729 translation as:
Law II: The alteration of motion is ever proportional to the motive force impress'd; and is made in the direction of the right line in which that force is impress'd."
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top