Why frequency-weight gauss meters for human-bias?

  • Thread starter Thread starter semiotically
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauss
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences between frequency-weighted and flat TriField gauss meters in measuring electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and their potential impact on human health. Frequency-weighted meters, calibrated to 50/60Hz, indicate higher induced energy levels at increased frequencies, suggesting that higher frequencies may have a greater effect on the body. In contrast, flat meters measure energy levels uniformly across a range of frequencies, making them suitable for applications not related to human health impacts. The conversation also raises questions about the influence of standard home power supplies on EMF exposure and the absorption rates of different frequencies. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for assessing the health implications of everyday electrical appliances.
semiotically
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I have read two ideas:

1. is that the 50/ 60Hz everyday home power supplies encourage this
2. that the higher frequencies are disproportionally (greater) 'absorbed' than the lower...

Please point me down the right track

Thank you,

Sem
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
TriField Flat verses Weighted Frequency Response


Weighted: The standard TriField Meter has a weighted frequency response that corresponds to the
potential current that would be induced into a body. As the frequency doubles, the amount of current
induced onto the body, over the same period of time, also doubles. The center frequency is 50Hz or 60Hz
specified at the time of order to correspond to the line frequency in your area/country.


If the 60Hz meter is in the presence of a 60Hz AC magnetic field with the energy level of 10 milligauss.
The meter will register 10 milligauss. If the same trifled meter is in the presence of a 120Hz AC magnetic
field with an energy level of 10 milligauss, the meter will register 20 milligauss, indicating the relative
induced energy impact on the body.


Flat: The flat TriField meter measurers the energy level present independent of the frequency of the
energy, provided that the frequency of the energy is between 30Hz and 1000Hz. This meter is
recommended for applications that are not related to the potential induced energy impact on a human body.



Frequency of a AC
Magnetic Field with a
level of 10 milligauss

Standard TriField 60Hz
Meter Response

Flat TriField Meter
Response

30Hz 5 Milligauss 10 Milligauss
60Hz 10 Milligauss 10 Milligauss
120Hz 20 Milligauss 10 Milligauss
240Hz 40 Milligauss 10 Milligauss
480Hz 80 Milligauss 10 Milligauss



Frequency of a AC
Magnetic Field with a
level of 10 milligauss

Standard TriField 50Hz
Meter Response

Flat TriField Meter
Response

30Hz 6 Milligauss 10 Milligauss
50Hz 10 Milligauss 10 Milligauss
100Hz 20 Milligauss 10 Milligauss
200Hz 40 Milligauss 10 Milligauss
400Hz 80 Milligauss 10 Milligauss
 
...measure energy independent of its frequency..?
 
semiotically said:
I have read two ideas:

1. is that the 50/ 60Hz everyday home power supplies encourage this
2. that the higher frequencies are disproportionally (greater) 'absorbed' than the lower...

Please point me down the right track

Thank you,

Sem

Welcome to the PF. Could you please post more background information for your question? What are you asking? Are you asking why 50/60 Hz is chosen over some other frequency for AC Mains power distribution? Or are you asking about something having to do with shock currents in humans that come in contact with AC Mains voltages?
 
I'm trying to contrast frequency-weighted with flat gauss meters and assess their qualities in measuring everyday electrical appliance EMFs that can induce current within the body..?
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Back
Top