Why ghost fields(Faddeev-Popov ghosts) must be ''ghost''?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ndung200790
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ghosts
ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Please teach me this:
Why can we not consider Faddeev ghost as a type of fermi fields,but consider them as a scalar under Lorentz transformation,therefore have wrong relation between spin and statistics?
Thank you very much for your kind helping.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physicall: ghost fields must "kill" unhysical polarizations of the gauge fields; the gluon fields has four components, but only two polarizations are physical (transversal). Gauge fixing + ghosts cancel the contribution of the two unphysical polarizaton.

mathematically: exponentiating the Fadeev-Popov determinant is possible only with Grassman numbers
 
I would add one question about ghost field: in one lecture, my teacher of classical field theory introduced ghost and tachyons saying that we can't couple them to ordinary matter because (quoting) "it would mean the destruction of the universe". So how is it that they couple as intermediate states between gauge fields?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top