Why gold rings are not made from 100% gold?

  • Thread starter Thread starter saranya_sarah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gold Rings
AI Thread Summary
Gold rings are not made from 100% gold because pure gold is too soft and malleable for practical use in jewelry. To enhance durability and strength, other metals like copper or zinc are added, creating an alloy. This mixture prevents deformation and improves the ring's longevity. Additionally, pure gold's reactivity with certain elements can be problematic, making alloys a better choice for everyday wear. Overall, the combination of metals ensures both aesthetic appeal and functional resilience in gold jewelry.
saranya_sarah
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known dat
  1. Why gold rings are not made from pure gold but mixed with other metals?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]my answer...because when two elements are combined chemically they produce a new compound and this avoids particles from sliding...i don't feel it's appropriate...please help me out
 
Physics news on Phys.org
saranya_sarah said:
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known dat
  1. Why gold rings are not made from pure gold but mixed with other metals?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]my answer...because when two elements are combined chemically they produce a new compound and this avoids particles from sliding...i don't feel it's appropriate...please help me out
You should do some basic research on the properties of gold:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold#Jewelry
 
  • Like
Likes saranya_sarah
Gold is only one metal, no other components, it creates electricity when contacting with other elements.
 
Qemikal said:
Gold is only one metal, no other components, it creates electricity when contacting with other elements.

Please elaborate. As stated this doesn't make much sense.
 
Borek said:
Please elaborate. As stated this doesn't make much sense.
Gold actually it's soft, so an 100% gold isn't practical, as it would change it's form. There is added some zinc or copper to make it more rigid.
What I tried to say earlier it's that it could also react with some other elements, depends on conditions(in normal conditions gold don't really react), and having a gold ring with a bit of copper is much better then a gold ring with more active metals. For @saranya_sarah, if you still need.
I hope it helped.
 
  • Like
Likes saranya_sarah
thx
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top