Why Ignore Tension In Pulley and Work Energy Problems?

AI Thread Summary
In pulley and block systems, it is often recommended to ignore the work done by cables and ropes to simplify work-energy problem analysis. This approach focuses on the blocks themselves, as the effects of pulley rotation and rope mass are typically small compared to the work needed to lift heavy masses. The discussion highlights that this simplification is based on differing orders of magnitude rather than any inherent properties of pulley systems. While real-world friction in pulleys and gears can sometimes be significant, especially in high ratio arrangements, it is generally negligible for basic problem-solving. Understanding these principles aids in effectively analyzing dynamics without unnecessary complications.
LickMyEyeball
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
A pulley and block system is a favorite type of system for analysis when considering work-energy problems in beginning dynamics.

It's commonly recommended that the best approach to the system is to write an equation for the whole system, while ignoring the work done by cables/ropes and focusing on the blocks themselves.

What is the property of rope and pulley systems that allows the analysis to ignore them in this case? I'm just curious and am looking for insight.

Thank you for your time.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It would unnecessarily complicate the analysis when the point is to learn to solve simple problems. It is true that some work is required to rotate the pulleys, ropes are not massless, etc., but in real world systems those effects are usually small compared to whatever work is required to accomplish the task as hand, such as lifting a heavy mass, and so can be ignored.
 
alan2 said:
It would unnecessarily complicate the analysis when the point is to learn to solve simple problems. It is true that some work is required to rotate the pulleys, ropes are not massless, etc., but in real world systems those effects are usually small compared to whatever work is required to accomplish the task as hand, such as lifting a heavy mass, and so can be ignored.

Thanks for your reply. So I understand that it's more a question of differing orders of magnitude, as opposed to some intrinsic property of pulley systems, say, always performing work functions that equal out to zero, for example.
 
Yes. It is akin to the perfectly frictionless surface.
 
LickMyEyeball said:
Thanks for your reply. So I understand that it's more a question of differing orders of magnitude, as opposed to some intrinsic property of pulley systems, say, always performing work functions that equal out to zero, for example.

Yes the former.

In the real world friction in pulleys and gears can't always be ignored. Particularly if you have a high ratio step-up arrangement where any friction in the output is magnified by the gear ratio to increase the required input torque considerably.
 
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Back
Top