Why Is Angular Momentum Not Conserved When a Cylinder Moves on a Stopping Board?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mark128
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Board Cylinder
AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum is not conserved when a cylinder moves on a stopping board due to the presence of external torque from friction. When analyzing the system, using the center of the cylinder as the axis of rotation leads to a non-zero change in angular momentum because of this frictional force. Alternatively, choosing the point of contact between the cylinder and the board allows for conservation of angular momentum, simplifying the calculations. Two methods are suggested for solving the problem: one involves accounting for friction while taking moments about the cylinder's center, and the other focuses on the point of contact to maintain angular momentum conservation. Understanding the role of external forces is crucial in determining the correct approach to the problem.
Mark128
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
On the flat surface lays a flat board with mass M, and on the board - a cylinder with mass m and radius r. Initially, board moves with velocity v, and cylinder rotates with such angular velocity, that it's stationary relative to the ground. Because of friciton between the board and surface, the board stops after some time. What is velocity of cylinder after that happens?
Relevant Equations
--
cylinder.PNG

I've been trying to solve it mainly through conservation of momentum and angular momentum, appareantly it's not correct. My idea was:
I, Moment of inertia = 0.5*m*r^2
L1, initial angular momentum = I * v/r

After a board stops, the change in it's momentum is M*v, so the impulse of torque on the cylinder will be M*v*r.

So the change in angular momentum is M*v*r.

So L2-0.5*m*r^2 = M*v*r

L2 = 0.5*m*r*v_final

So v_final = v*(0.5*m + M)/(0.5*m)

But as mentioned earlier, it's incorrect and I'm also not entirely sure which part is wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
You can only take angular momentum about some chosen axis to be conserved in a system if there are no external forces that have a torque about that axis. You appear to be taking the centre of the cylinder as axis, but there is friction (rolling contact) between the cylinder and the board.
What axis could you use to avoid this difficulty?
 
haruspex said:
You can only take angular momentum about some chosen axis to be conserved in a system if there are no external forces that have a torque about that axis. You appear to be taking the centre of the cylinder as axis, but there is friction (rolling contact) between the cylinder and the board.
What axis could you use to avoid this difficulty?

Yes, I was taking a center of the cylinder keeping in mind, that there is friction acting on it, and that's why change in angular momentum (L2-L1) is non-zero.

If I choose point of contact as center, the angular momentum is in fact conserved, but I don't know, how this could help.
 
Mark128 said:
Yes, I was taking a center of the cylinder keeping in mind, that there is friction acting on it, and that's why change in angular momentum (L2-L1) is non-zero.

If I choose point of contact as center, the angular momentum is in fact conserved, but I don't know, how this could help.
There are two ways you can solve it:
1. Take moments about the cylinder’s centre, but include the torque from friction with the board and write a linear momentum equation also involving the friction. (You will have terms like ##\int F.dt##.)
2. Take moments about a point at the surface of the board. (Better not to think of it as a point fixed to the board or the point of contact over time since in principle that gets you into noninertial frames.) Since angular momentum of the cylinder is conserved about such a point you can get the answer in one equation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top