Why is Bar Magnet Length Referred to as "2l"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter logearav
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt Magnetism
AI Thread Summary
The term "2l" for the length of a bar magnet refers to the total length, combining both poles, with "l" representing the length of a single pole. This notation simplifies calculations by allowing the 2 to cancel out in formulas, resulting in cleaner expressions. Using "2l" avoids more complex fractions, similar to preferring radius over diameter in area calculations. The approach aims to streamline mathematical representations in physics. Overall, this convention enhances clarity in understanding magnet properties.
logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0
folks,
in higher secondary books i came across magnet's length that is bar magnet's length is given as " 2l" that is 2 multiplied by l. my question is " why the length is not referred as 'l' the usual way of referring length.
please clarify in layman terms.
thanks in advance
logesh aravindan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i am a poor one in english but iff i understund : they make that in order to have a simple formula ;because(may be) they will divid by 2 so in the place to have this ugly (l/2) they just have this beautiful (l). and i recall that in the baccalaureat exam of this year ,they gave us (2l) in order to pertutbate you .
 
i don't understand please clarify lucidly
 
I would have to see the book, but I'm assuming the l is referring to the length of a single pole, so the total length of the magnet is 2l. That is l of the north and l of the south combined.

CraigD, AMInstP
www.cymek.com
 
arkhammedos is right. Often the length is given as '2l' so the 2 will cancel out and leave a cleaner expression.

It is like choosing radius and not diameter so we can write A=\pi r^2 and not A=\frac{\pi D^2}{4}
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
13K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
81
Views
15K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top