Why is diffraction most pronounced for objects on the order of the wavelength?

AI Thread Summary
Diffraction effects are most pronounced when the size of the diffracting objects is comparable to the wavelength of the waves involved. Larger objects result in less noticeable diffraction, as seen in phenomena like single-slit diffraction, where larger slits produce minimal diffraction effects. The relationship between wavelength and distance is crucial; when the ratio of wavelength to distance is small, diffraction is minimal, while a larger ratio increases diffraction. This understanding helps clarify why smaller obstacles or apertures lead to more significant diffraction. Overall, the size of the object relative to the wavelength is key to the extent of diffraction observed.
lionelwang
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hello!
Recently, I'm always thinking about why diffraction effects are generally most pronounced for the size of the diffracting objectsis that is on the order of the wavelength. How about a relatively bigger object?

I try to find it everywhere I can but failed. So anyone can help? Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
lionelwang said:
Hello!
Recently, I'm always thinking about why diffraction effects are generally most pronounced for the size of the diffracting objectsis that is on the order of the wavelength. How about a relatively bigger object?

I try to find it everywhere I can but failed. So anyone can help? Thanks!

Can you explain a bit more? what kind of objects are you talking about?
 
such as bending of waves around small obstacles and the spreading out of waves past small openings.
A famous example:single-slit diffraction. If the slit is pretty large, then I guess there is no abvious diffaction.
 
lionelwang said:
Hello!
Recently, I'm always thinking about why diffraction effects are generally most pronounced for the size of the diffracting objectsis that is on the order of the wavelength. How about a relatively bigger object?

I try to find it everywhere I can but failed. So anyone can help? Thanks!

The wave propagation of light is parameterized in terms of a specific length scale (the wavelength). That means the problem is in terms of ratios: wavelength/distance, for example. If wavelength/distance <<1, the appropriate diffraction term is small, while if wavelength/distance >>1, it's large. Note that 'distance' can be propagation distance, the size of a scattering object, or aperture diameter...

Does that help?
 
Andy Resnick said:
The wave propagation of light is parameterized in terms of a specific length scale (the wavelength). That means the problem is in terms of ratios: wavelength/distance, for example. If wavelength/distance <<1, the appropriate diffraction term is small, while if wavelength/distance >>1, it's large. Note that 'distance' can be propagation distance, the size of a scattering object, or aperture diameter...

Does that help?

I think you are right, thank you very much!
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...

Similar threads

Back
Top