Why is frequency response an important characteristic of an amplifier?

S_Flaherty
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Why is frequency response an important characteristic of an amplifier?

in this situation we are using a transistor and had to calculate gain using specified frequencies
and the resulting voltages through our circuit.

My understanding of contemporary electronics is not as strong as i want it to be
so even though I'm pretty sure this is a very basic question I'm still having trouble.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An amplifier receives an input signal and outputs as signal with an increase in magnitude.
You would want the output to have no distortion and the increase in magnitude to be constant for the range of frequencies you are interested in. ( ie a flat response is desired in certain situations such as an audio amplifier ).

An audio amplifier, such as one that would play a song from a CD, would have to have a flat response for the range of human hearing, 50 Hz to 20,000 Hz so that you could hear the music and vocals as they were recorded. A telephone response would be in the range from 200Hz to 5000Hz approximately which is the range of the human voice.

Other criteria besides amplification might include stability for example, .

Look up frequency response on the internet for more information.
Some sites:
http://stereos.about.com/od/faqs/f/freqresp.htm
http://www.mediacollege.com/audio/microphones/frequency-response.html
 
256bits said:
An amplifier receives an input signal and outputs as signal with an increase in magnitude.
You would want the output to have no distortion and the increase in magnitude to be constant for the range of frequencies you are interested in. ( ie a flat response is desired in certain situations such as an audio amplifier ).

An audio amplifier, such as one that would play a song from a CD, would have to have a flat response for the range of human hearing, 50 Hz to 20,000 Hz so that you could hear the music and vocals as they were recorded. A telephone response would be in the range from 200Hz to 5000Hz approximately which is the range of the human voice.


Sorry i guess i wasn't clear. this isn't an audio amplifier. just any part of a circuit that amplifies the signal.
 
S_Flaherty said:
256bits said:
An amplifier receives an input signal and outputs as signal with an increase in magnitude.
You would want the output to have no distortion and the increase in magnitude to be constant for the range of frequencies you are interested in. ( ie a flat response is desired in certain situations such as an audio amplifier ).

An audio amplifier, such as one that would play a song from a CD, would have to have a flat response for the range of human hearing, 50 Hz to 20,000 Hz so that you could hear the music and vocals as they were recorded. A telephone response would be in the range from 200Hz to 5000Hz approximately which is the range of the human voice.
Sorry i guess i wasn't clear. this isn't an audio amplifier. just any part of a circuit that amplifies the signal.

The audio amplifier was just a specific example that 256bits was giving to illustrate the more general idea that you want to avoid excessive distortion of your input signal by the amplifier, and you do this by ensuring that it has relatively constant gain across the range of frequencies you expect to be contained in your input (i.e. across the "bandwidth" of your input signal). If some frequencies in your input are attenuated because your amplifier has lower responsivity there, then obviously the amplified output signal is not going to be an accurate/faithful reproduction of the input.
 
cepheid said:
The audio amplifier was just a specific example that 256bits was giving to illustrate the more general idea that you want to avoid excessive distortion of your input signal by the amplifier, and you do this by ensuring that it has relatively constant gain across the range of frequencies you expect to be contained in your input (i.e. across the "bandwidth" of your input signal). If some frequencies in your input are attenuated because your amplifier has lower responsivity there, then obviously the amplified output signal is not going to be an accurate/faithful reproduction of the input.

Alright now i understand. Thanks for clearing things up for me.
 
Another point which may possibly be relevant to the OP.

Arbitrary periodic wave shapes can be resolved as a combination of frequencies (Fourier Transformation). Failure to amplify all frequencies in the bandwidth uniformly will distort the wave shape. In the example of a digital signal it may make the result more susceptible to errors.

Obviously however the problem with and answer to your question is that the importance is relative to the application. In some applications one need (or specifically desire to ) only amplify a nearly pure single frequency, for example CW transmitter for sending Morse code or IF stage in a superhetrodyne receiver (classic AM transistor radios). In other cases you need a wide bandwidth as with e.g. audio amplifiers which cover 7 to 8 octaves.

So frequency response is important for matching the amplifier to the application.
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top