Why Is Friction Opposite to Wheel Acceleration in Rolling Motion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the direction of friction in rolling motion. A constant horizontal force of 10 N is applied to a 10 kg wheel, resulting in an acceleration of 0.6 m/s². The calculated frictional force is -4 N, indicating it acts opposite to the wheel's acceleration. The participant questions why friction opposes acceleration, suggesting it should align with the direction of motion. The conversation highlights the complexities of friction in rolling objects and the application of Newton's laws.
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



In the figure, a constant horizontal force Fa magnitude 10 is applied to a wheel of mass 10 kg and radius .4 m. The wheel rolls smoothly on the horizontal surface, and the acceleration of the center of mass has magnitude .6 m/s^2.

Find frictional force on wheel.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



f = ma

10 + friction = ma = 6

friction = -4

I don't understand why my friction direction is opposite of the direction the wheel is accelerating. It should be in the same direction. Obviously the math is fine, but why is the friction going in the same direction that the wheel has the tendency to slide in?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newton's third law of motion.
 
1MileCrash said:

Homework Statement



In the figure, a constant horizontal force Fa magnitude 10 is applied to a wheel of mass 10 kg and radius .4 m. The wheel rolls smoothly on the horizontal surface, and the acceleration of the center of mass has magnitude .6 m/s^2.

Find frictional force on wheel.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



f = ma

10 + friction = ma = 6

friction = -4

I don't understand why my friction direction is opposite of the direction the wheel is accelerating. It should be in the same direction. Obviously the math is fine, but why is the friction going in the same direction that the wheel has the tendency to slide in?

Quite hard to see the difficulty as I can't find "the figure"
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top