Why Is It Easier to Swing a Linear Flat Stick Compared to Other Types?

AI Thread Summary
Swinging a linear flat stick is easier than swinging a heavier stick or a baseball bat due to differences in moment of inertia. Moment of inertia measures an object's resistance to rotational motion, influenced by its mass and how that mass is distributed relative to the pivot point. Heavier objects or those with mass distributed farther from the pivot require more force to swing. Therefore, the design and weight distribution of the stick significantly impact its ease of use. Understanding these principles can clarify why certain objects are easier to swing in a physical context.
@m@
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hi to everyone!
i want to ask that,
why it is easier to swing a linear flat stick rather than any other heavy stick or a baseball stick ?
what is the reasion of this question in physics point of view?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I'm not sure what you mean by "a linear flat stick rather than a heavy stick or baseball stick". But generally the difficulty to swing something is related to its moment of inertia. You probably know about normal inertia, which is an object's resistance to translational motion. Well, objects have something called a moment of inertia which is its resistance to spinning.

Moment of inertia depends on the mass of an object and its distribution (if it's farther away from the pivot point, it's harder to swing). So, either the objects are more massive or their mass is farther away from the pivot point.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top