Why Is My Calculation of Net Torque Incorrect?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a physics problem involving the calculation of net torque on a square metal plate due to three forces. The user initially calculates the torques for each force but arrives at an incorrect net torque of 1.61 N m instead of the expected 2.5 N m. A potential error identified is the misuse of the sine function in the torque calculation for one of the forces. Specifically, it is suggested that the user may have mistakenly multiplied by sin45º instead of dividing by it. Clarification on the correct approach to calculating torque is needed to resolve the discrepancy.
jghlee
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is the problem: http://session.masteringphysics.com/prob ...

A squar emetal plate .180 m on each side is pivoted about an axis through point O at its center and perpendicular to the plate. Calculate the net torque about this axis due to the three forces shown in the figure if the magnitudes of the forces are F1=18.0n, F2=26.0N, and F3=14.0N. The plate and all forces are in the plane of the page.

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so this problem looks simple enough... but I get the wrong answer.

So here's what I did. I individually calculated the torques for each force.

Torque for F1: (18.0)(.09)=1.62
Torque for F2: (26.0)(.09)=2.34
Torque for F3: (14.0)(sin45)(.09)=.89095

Then I find the net torque by...
-F1+F2+F3=1.61N m

but the answer should be 2.5N m.

Can anybody tell me what I'm doing wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't open your link.
 
Welcome to PF!

jghlee said:
Torque for F1: (18.0)(.09)=1.62
Torque for F2: (26.0)(.09)=2.34
Torque for F3: (14.0)(sin45)(.09)=.89095

Then I find the net torque by...
-F1+F2+F3=1.61N m

but the answer should be 2.5N m.

Hi jghlee! Welcome to PF! :smile:

I can't see the picture :cry: (you've chopped off the end of the url :rolleyes:) …

but since you're exactly 0.89 out, my guess :wink: is that you've multiplied by sin45º instead of dividing by it! :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top