Why Is My Matrix Not Diagonalizing Correctly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NavalChicken
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
NavalChicken
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is part of a larger problem of finding e^A, where <br /> <br /> <br /> A = \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 0 &amp; 0 &amp; -2 \\ 1 &amp; 2 &amp; 1 \\ 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 3 \end{array} \right]<br /> <br />


Homework Equations


-


The Attempt at a Solution




I generally have no problems with diagonalising a matrix, however, in this case I just can't seem to get it to work. I've got the eigenvectors to be (-1, 0, 1)^T, (0, 1, 0)^T, (-2, 1, 1)^T

Once carried through the steps of finding P, A, P^{-2} and finding the diagonal, I come out with

D = \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 2 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 2 &amp; 2 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \end{array} \right]

I've checked it on wolframalpha and on maple and both confirm that my inverse is correct and following through the multiplication both come out with the same result. Chances are I've just made a silly mistake somewhere. Can someone help me spot it?

Thankyou
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean you did D=P^(-1)AP where P is the matrix whose columns are the eigenvectors, right? I did the same thing and got D=diag(2,2,1). What did you get for P^(-1)?
 
Sorry, I did mean P^{-1}

Which I had as:

<br /> <br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 2 \\ 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 1 \\ -1 &amp; 0 &amp; -1 \end{array} \right]
 
Looks right.

With P:
\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} -1 &amp; 0 &amp; -2 \\ 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 1 \\ 1 &amp; 0 &amp; -1 \end{array} \right] <br />

I get P^(-1)AP=diag(2,2,1). I do notice that if I do PAP^(-1) I get your off diagonal result D. That's not the right order.
 
Last edited:
Oh, yes, it was down to wrong order. Very silly!

Thanks for clearing that up
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top