Why is P-Type Conductivity Limited in Transparent Conducting Oxides?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bilalarif
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conductivity Metal
AI Thread Summary
P-type conductivity in transparent conducting oxides (TCOs) is limited due to the strong ionic bonding between metal and oxygen, which causes holes to localize at the valence band edge dominated by oxygen-2p levels. Enhancing co-valency in metal-oxygen bonding through specific cations or structural changes may improve conductivity. However, it is argued that hole localization does not inherently limit p-type conductivity, as evidenced by p-type conduction in perovskite oxides where holes can be self-trapped on oxygen sites. Recent research challenges the notion that increased covalency reduces self-trapping, highlighting exceptions like rare-earth nickelates. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of hole behavior in TCOs and the need for updated insights beyond earlier studies.
bilalarif
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I was reading about semiconductor transparent conducting oxides and I found this why p-type conductivity is limited in TCOs. But I could not understand its meaning please someone explain me how the holes are localized at valance band edge and how dominated by oxygen- 2p levels?

''Owing to the strong ionic nature of metal-oxygen bonding, holes are typically localized at the valence band
edge, which is dominated by oxygen-2p levels therefore limiting p-type conduction. Two methods have been
suggested to enhance the co-valency between metal oxygen bonding, thereby limiting localization:1 choosing cations having closed d-shells of energy comparable to that of the oxygen-2p levels (i.e., Cu+, Ag+, and Au+, especially when found in linear coordination with oxygen2), and choosing a structure in which oxygen adopts tetrahedral coordination''
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I do not think this statement is very precise. If holes tend to be localized, they would be localized in a gap state close to but not right at the valence band edge. It is also not true that hole localization limits the p-type conductivity. Take for example p-type conduction in perovskite oxides. In many cases it proceeds via hole conduction and these holes are self-trapped on oxygen sites and are derived from 2p states of oxygen.

Could you cite the source paper of this statement?
 
here is that paper
 

Attachments

I think the sentence highlighted in red encompasses too many information and in fact recent work on hole-self-trapping brought new insights beyond 2004 at the time of writing this paper. In fact even the concept that covalency of metal-oxygen bond reduces self-trapping is questionable. Take for example rare-earth nickelates. The bonding between Ni and O has a clear covalent character, in spite of this hole trapping on oxygen occurs.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top