Why is steel a better heat conductor than wood?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xyz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics question regarding the thermal conductivity of materials, specifically comparing steel and wood. The correct answer to why a student's tongue would stick to a cold steel post instead of a wooden one is that steel is a better heat conductor. When the tongue contacts the cold steel, heat is rapidly transferred away, causing the tongue to freeze and stick. In contrast, wood has low thermal conductivity, which means it retains heat around the contact area, preventing the tongue from sticking. The key takeaway is that the thermal properties of materials significantly affect heat transfer and the risk of injury in such scenarios.
xyz
Hi,there
I got a question from my sample test. That is:

"After passing 2B with flying colors, you are called one winter to rescue a physics 10 student who unknowingly puts his tongue against a cold steel post. As you peel his tongue off the post, you knowingly explain that, next time, he should instead lick a wooden post because:
a)steel has a higher specific heat than wood
b)wood is not as good a radiator of heat
c)steel has a higher specific gracity
d)steel is a better heat conductor
e)wood is not magnetic

I guess the key to the question is D. If I am right, why? If not, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
D is correct.

Metal is much better at conducting heat. Therefore if someone puts their tongue against cold metal, the metal will efficiently conduct heat away from tongue.

In wood it is different. Wood has low thermal conductivity, which means that the heat from the tongue will remain localised around the contact area, which would prevent any tongues getting stuck to it.
 


Yes, the correct answer is D) steel is a better heat conductor. This means that heat can transfer more easily through steel compared to wood. When the student's tongue comes into contact with the cold steel post, the heat from their tongue is quickly transferred to the post, causing their tongue to freeze and stick. However, if the student had licked a wooden post instead, the heat from their tongue would not transfer as easily to the post, allowing their tongue to stay warm and not stick. This is because wood is a poorer conductor of heat compared to steel. I hope this helps!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top