Why is the equation for compression work P=kV and not P=Pi/Vi?

  • Thread starter Thread starter grandpa2390
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compression
AI Thread Summary
The equation for compression work is expressed as P=kV, where k is derived from initial pressure and volume (Pi/Vi). The distinction between using initial (Pi/Vi) and final (Pf/Vf) values affects the calculation of k, leading to different results when converting units. While both methods yield similar results in certain units, the choice of initial values is crucial for accuracy in specific contexts. Factors such as heat generation during compression and the effect of dead volume also influence the calculations. Understanding these nuances is essential for solving compression work problems effectively.
grandpa2390
Messages
473
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


I am doing a problem of compression work. in order to solve it, I have to find an equation for the line and integrate it to get the work. But I don't understand why ##k = \frac{P_i}{V_i}##

Homework Equations



P=kV

The Attempt at a Solution



Why is it Pi / Vi and not Pf / Vf ? They both give different answers. In original units of atmospheres and liters they both give the same number (1). IT is when you convert to meters cubed and N/meters cubed that the value of k is different. it is not far off, but slightly.

Is it just a margin of error, but in general either one works. Or is using the initial values a matter of importance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are different ways of calculating compression work depending on what happens to the heat generated by the compression process .

There are sometimes practical things to take into account as well such as effect of dead volume .

Can you tell us more exactly what problem you are working on ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top