Why is the heat of formation defined?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 392791
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formation Heat
AI Thread Summary
The heat of formation is defined as the enthalpy change when one mole of a compound is formed from its elements in their standard states. While the heat of reaction can be calculated for any reaction at specified conditions, it fundamentally relies on the heat of formation values of the reactants and products involved. The heat of formation serves as a benchmark, allowing for the calculation of heats of reaction using Hess's law. Not all heats of reaction correspond to heats of formation, as demonstrated by the combustion of methane, which involves multiple compounds. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate thermodynamic measurements and calculations.
member 392791
It seems to me that the heat of reaction nullifies the concept of the heat of formation. The heat of formation is the enthalpy change associated with formation of 1 mole of a compound from its constituent elements in its standard state.

The heat of reaction is the enthalpy change that occur when stoichiometric quantities of reactants at some T and p react to form products at the same T and p.

Well, if you define T and p, then the heat of reaction should be the same as the heat of formation, right? Therefore, the standard heat of formation and standard heat of reaction is the same, provided that one mole of the compound is formed. However, the heat of reaction gives flexibility in that its not limited to standard state, and also it can be for any amount of moles formed, as long as the stoichiometric quantity is correct.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
How do you calculate heat of reaction?

Far from "nullifying the concept of heat of formation", the concept of heat of reaction is absolutely dependent on the concept of heat of formation.
 
I am not able to differentiate the two. I know that the heat of reaction depends on the heat of formation, but conceptually I can't distinguish the two. Isn't the heat of reaction of a chemical reaction that forms a product the same as the heat of formation?

I'll use the following as an example

C + O2 ---> CO2

Is the heat of formation not the heat of reaction at standard state?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, the heat of formation of CO2 is the heat of reaction of the following reaction under standard contitions:

C (s, graphite) + O2 (g) --> CO2 (g)

However, not all heat of reactions are heats of formation. For example, the heat of reaction for the combustion of methane:

CH4 + 2 O2 --> CO2 + 2 H2O

is not the heat of formation of anything. (However, you can find the value for the heat of reaction from the heats of formation of methane, carbon dioxide, and water by using Hess's law).
 
Enthalpy of formation describes a special reaction where you form some compound from "scratch." Of course we can't violate energy/matter conservation, so we simply assign a value of zero to the most stable elemental form of the elements which make our compound at some temperature and 1 bar pressure. Its a way for us to set an arbitrary benchmark from which to start measuring other things, like heats of reaction which can be calculated by summing the heats of formation of each term in the chemical equation weighted by their stoichiometric coefficients and where the coefficients are positive for products and negative for reactants (\sum _{i} \Delta H ^{°} _{f,i} \ast \nu _{i}). It helps to keep in mind the path independent nature of the state functions in thermodynamics, you imagine that any compound you are considering will have ultimately come from the constituents in there elemental form which have a defined enthalpy of zero and became transformed into your compound. Think Standard Hydrogen Electrode for defining E°. These kinds of definitions allow us to set up scales and make useful measurements.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top